OSHA Inspection: LCG CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Issued

May 12, 2022

Abate by

Jun 8, 2022

Penalty

Initial $349 · Current $349

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:    The employer failed to provide  OSHA with certification and documentation for the citations issued on February 4, 2022 for the following worksite located at16000 Ruth St., Parkville, Missouri- Employees were exposed to silica hazards in the employees were observed cutting stone veneer and had failed to use engineering practices AS specified for the task In Table 1.

Issued

Feb 4, 2022

Penalty

Initial $3,729 · Current $3,729

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Worksite located at 16000 Ruth St., Parkville, Missouri- Employees were observed working directly beneath elevated materials and equipment and were not protected from impact by the use of any means of head protection.

Issued

Feb 4, 2022

Penalty

Initial $3,729 · Current $3,729

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  Worksite located at 16000 Ruth St., Parkville, Missouri-  Employees were observed using hand held grinders in order to cut the rock and were not wearing any means of eye protection to prevent damage from rock fragments or broken blades.

Issued

Feb 4, 2022

Abate by

Mar 3, 2022

Penalty

Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351

Hazardous substances 9000

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1153(c)(1):For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section:  Worksite located at16000 Ruth St., Parkville, Missouri- Employees were exposed to silica hazards in the employees were observed cutting stone veneer and had failed to use engineering practices AS specified for the task In Table 1.