FORT WALTON BEACH, FL —
OSHA Inspection: GATLIN LUMBER & SUPPLY COMPANY, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GATLIN LUMBER & SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. in 57 BEAL PARKWAY NORTHWEST, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL 32548 (NAICS 423310). OSHA activity number 345716310.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GATLIN LUMBER & SUPPLY COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 57 BEAL PARKWAY NORTHWEST
- City
- FORT WALTON BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32548
- Mailing
- 57 BEAL PARKWAY NORTHWEST, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL 32548
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423310
- Employees
- 29
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2022
- Abate by
- May 13, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $3,046 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to slip/trip/fall hazards and/or being struck-by hazards: a) Warehouse 2A and 2B; The employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that adequate lighting was not provided when employees were assisting in the loading of forklifts, performing inventory, and moving vehicles in and out of the warehouse. b) Warehouse 2A and 2B; The employer exposed employees to slip, trip and fall hazards in that employees in the warehouse were working in areas when wet surfaces were present and adequate lighting was not provided.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3046
- — Z (S) $4351
1910.22 D02
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,931 · Current $3,452 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(2):29 CFR 1910.22(d)(2): The employer did not ensure that hazardous conditions on walking-working surfaces are corrected or repaired before an employee uses the walking-working surface again. The employer did not ensure that if the correction or repair cannot be made immediately, the hazard is guarded to prevent employees from using the walking-working surface until the hazard is corrected or repaired: a) On or about March 3, 2022 and times prior; Warehouse #2 inside storage area: The employer failed to ensure numerous damaged concrete floor areas involving holes and ruts/uneven areas throughout both sides and the center area where employees walk were repaired to prevent potential fall hazards to the same level. b) On or about March 3, 2022 and times prior; Warehouse #2 outside area: The employer failed to ensure numerous surface areas of damaged concrete creating holes where employees walk, load, and unload material were repaired to prevent potential fall hazards to the same level. c) On or about March 3, 2022 and times prior; Warehouse #2B outside area: The employer failed to ensure a large surface area of damaged concrete creating holes/uneven areas where employees walk was repaired to prevent potential fall hazards to the same level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3452
- — Z (S) $4931
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $5,801 · Current $4,061 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii):The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck: a) On or about March 3, 2022 and times prior; Warehouse #2 inside storage area: The employer failed to ensure employees who operate forklifts such as but not limited to the Yale #9 & #12 forklifts were trained and evaluated prior to allowing them to operate the forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4061
- — Z (S) $5801
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service: a) On or about March 3, 2022 and times prior; Warehouse #2 inside storage area: The employer failed to ensure the Yale #9 forklift was inspected prior to operation to identify items such as but not limited to headlights were in working condition.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423310)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345716310.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.