REYNOLDSBURG, OH —
OSHA Inspection: PEDRO GONZALES
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PEDRO GONZALES in 3269 HAIRST DRIVE, REYNOLDSBURG, OH 43068 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345724421.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PEDRO GONZALES
- Site address
- 3269 HAIRST DRIVE
- City
- REYNOLDSBURG
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43068
- Mailing
- 553 WHITETHORNE AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43223
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2022
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. a. Located at 3269 Hairst Drive, Reynoldsburg, Ohio: On or about January 13, 2022, the employer did not develop a safety and health program to ensure that hazards were identified and corrected onsite for employees performing framing work.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. Located at 3269 Hairst Drive, Reynoldsburg, Ohio: On or about January 13, 2022, the employer did not ensure that employees performing framing work from the second floor were protected from approximately fifteen-foot fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2022
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,486 · Current $2,486
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. a. Located at 3269 Hairst Drive, Reynoldsburg, Ohio: On or about January 13, 2022, employees were using a six foot step ladder to access the second floor. The ladder did not extend at least three foot above the landing, thereby exposing employees to an approximately nine-foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2486
More inspections at Pedro Gonzales
View Pedro Gonzales's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345724421.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.