WAXAHACHIE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL MARANDA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL MARANDA in 51 ANNA LEIGH LN, WAXAHACHIE, TX 75167 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345728737.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIGUEL MARANDA
- Site address
- 51 ANNA LEIGH LN
- City
- WAXAHACHIE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75167
- Mailing
- 1208 COUNTY ROAD 2738, CADDO MILLS, TX 75135
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 26, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $1,865 · Current $1,865
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. On the construction site, employees engaged in roofing work use pneumatic nail guns without wearing eye protection was exposed to struck-by hazards and eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1865
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 26, 2022
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,486 · Current $2,486
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). On the west side of the construction site, employees engaged in roofing work without fall protection were exposed to unprotected fall hazards of approximately 12 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2486
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jan 26, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $1,585 · Current $1,585
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. On the west side of the construction site, employees using an extension ladder that did not have the side rails extended three feet over the roof surface were exposed to potential fall hazards greater than six feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1585
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jan 26, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $297 · Current $297
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. On the construction site, the employer did not develop or provide fall protection training to the employees engaged in roofing work to recognize and eliminate fall hazards when working over 6 feet and utilizing extension ladders.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $297
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345728737.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.