TRUMBULL, CT —
OSHA Inspection: IMAGEFIRST HEALTHCARE LAUNDRY SPECIALIST, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of IMAGEFIRST HEALTHCARE LAUNDRY SPECIALIST, LLC in 50 COMMERCE DRIVE, TRUMBULL, CT 06611 (NAICS 812332). OSHA activity number 345732382.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- IMAGEFIRST HEALTHCARE LAUNDRY SPECIALIST, LLC
- Site address
- 50 COMMERCE DRIVE
- City
- TRUMBULL
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06611
- Mailing
- 50 COMMERCE DRIVE, TRUMBULL, CT 06611
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 812332
- Employees
- 29
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C06 I B
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $14,502 · Current $7,251 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i)(B): The periodic inspection of the energy control procedure was not conducted to correct any deviations or inadequacies identified: Facility: The periodic inspection was not conducted to correct any deviations or inadequacies identified, to include but not limited to the Kannegiesser ETECH Windup Fold Table.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7251
- — Z (S) $14502
1910.147 C07 III B
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $14,502 · Current $10,151 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(iii)(B): Additional retraining was not provided whenever a periodic inspection under 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6) revealed that there were deviations from or inadequacies in the employee's knowledge or use of the energy control procedures: Facility: An employee operating the Kannegiesser ETECH Windup Fold Table was not retrained when inadequacies in the employee's knowledge for the energy control procedures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $10151.4
- — Z (S) $14502
1910.264 D02 I A
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $14,502 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.264(d)(2)(i)(a):Operating Rules, Mechanical, Safety Guards. No safeguard, safety appliance, or device attached to, or forming an integral part of any machinery shall be removed or made ineffective except for the purpose of making immediate repairs or adjustments. Any such safeguard, safety appliance, or device removed or made ineffective during the repair or adjustment of such machinery shall be replaced immediately upon the completion of such repairs or adjustments. Facility: A guard was not in place on the Kannegiesser ETECH where employees were performing folding job tasks in the Gown folding department.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $14502
1904.7 B03
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,072 · Current $1,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3): An injury or illness involving one or more days away from work, was not recorded on the OSHA 300 Log with a check mark in the space for cases involving days away and an entry of the number of calendar days away from work in the number of days column. If the employee is out for an extended period of time, you must enter an estimate of the days that the employee will be away, and update the day count when the actual number of days is known: Facility: On the OSHA 300 Log for 2021, Case IE-2112-0065-1 where an employee was injured and hospitalized, the number of calendar days away from work was entered as one (1) and the employee experienced at least 180 days away from work. Abatement Certification and Documentation is required
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1450.4
- — Z (O) $2072
1904.29 B02
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,072 · Current $1,036 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(2):The employer did not fill out or correctly fill out an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for each recordable injury or illness. Facility: On or about June 15, 2022, six (6) OSHA 301s or equivalent were not accurately completed where the case number was missing from five (5) and one (1) log had an incorrect case number.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1036
- — Z (O) $2072
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $7,500 · Current $5,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2):The employer did not report within 24-hours a work-related incident resulting in in-patient hospitalization, amputation or the loss of an eye. Facility: The employer did not report within 24-hours a work-related incident resulting in an in-patient hospitalization that occurred on December 30, 2021.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $5250
- — Z (O) $7500
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 812332)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345732382.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.