Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BRITT GARCIA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BRITT GARCIA in 7043 CLARENCE GARCIA RD., BAY SAINT LOUIS, MS 39520 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 345732838.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Britt Garcia — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Britt Garcia is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BRITT GARCIA
Site address
7043 CLARENCE GARCIA RD.
City
BAY SAINT LOUIS
State
MS
ZIP
39520
Mailing
7043 CLARENCE GARCIA RD., BAY SAINT LOUIS, MS 39520
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(2):Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  (a)On or about 1/19/2022 at 5126 3rd St. Bay St. Louis, MS 39520 the scaffold used by employees lacked base plates.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.451 C02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(2)(i):Footings shall be level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement.  a. On or about 1/19/2022 at 5126 3rd St. Bay St. Louis, MS 39520 scaffolding footing was unbalanced with different wood boards stacked irregularly.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1):Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level shall be protected from falling to that lower level. Paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section establish the types of fall protection to be provided to the employees on each type of scaffold. Paragraph (g)(2) of this section addresses fall protection for scaffold erectors and dismantlers.  a.  On or about 1/19/2022 at 5126 3rd St. Bay St. Louis, MS 39520, employees were working on the edge of scaffolding without any guardrail system or personal fall arrest systems exposing employees to a fall height of 18 feet.  Note to paragraph (g)(1): The fall protection requirements for employees installing suspension scaffold support systems on floors, roofs, and other elevated surfaces are set forth in subpart M of this part.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 21, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2022
Penalty
Initial $6,216 · Current $3,400 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.   a. On or about 1/19/2022  on a residential roof at 5126 3rd St. Bay St. Louis, MS 39520, employees were working on the edge of the roof without any guardrail system or personal fall arrest systems exposing  employees to a fall height of 18 feet.      Britt Garcia was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1376875, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on April 17, 2019  with respect to a workplace located at 132 Harbor ST. Pass Christian, MS. 39571
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $3400
  • — Z (R) $6216

View Britt Garcia's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345732838.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.