CYPRESS, TX —
OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL ELIAS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL ELIAS in 9215 MILLSDEN LN., CYPRESS, TX 77433 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345745186.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIGUEL ELIAS
- Site address
- 9215 MILLSDEN LN.
- City
- CYPRESS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77433
- Mailing
- 1001 TURNER DR., HOUSTON, TX 77076
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $1,554 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles. On or about January 19, 2022, employees were exposed to flying particles while operating a pneumatic nail gun without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1554
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $1,554 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. On or about January 26, 2022, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of more than 10 feet while attaching siding to the exterior of a single-family dwelling.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1554
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $2,176 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. On or about January 26, 2022, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of more than 10 feet while attaching siding to the exterior of a single-family dwelling due to the pump jack scaffold attachment braces not being attached to the bottom part of the pole.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2175.5
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.1052 C01 II
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,486 · Current $1,243 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge. On or about January 26, 2022, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard while using a stairway that was not equipped with at least one stair rail system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1243
- — Z (S) $2486
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345745186.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.