Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AUREL GIURGIU

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AUREL GIURGIU in CORNER OR AMB CAFFERY AND FREM BOUSTANY DR, LAFAYETTE, LA 70501 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 345769202.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aurel Giurgiu — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aurel Giurgiu is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AUREL GIURGIU
Site address
CORNER OR AMB CAFFERY AND FREM BOUSTANY DR
City
LAFAYETTE
State
LA
ZIP
70501
Mailing
13388 ALDER DR., DENHAM SPRINGS, LA 70726
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $2,611 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about February 8, 2022, on the Northeast side of the site employees were performing masonry work on a scaffolding with materials on the upper levels. Employees were without head protection, exposing the workers below to falling debris and materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2610.6
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2022
Abate by
Apr 4, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $2,611 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary.   On or about February 8, 2022, on the Northeast side of the site employees were performing masonry work on the outside of a building utilizing scaffolding with gaps in-between planks larger than one inch (1) inches wide at heights upwards of ten feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2610.6
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $2,486 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation.  On or about February 8, 2022, on the Northeast side of the site employees were performing masonry work on the outside of a building utilizing scaffolding that  was erected with base plates.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2486

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffolds, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Cross braces were used as a means of access.  On or about February 8, 2022, on the Northeast side of the site employees were performing masonry work on the outside of a building utilizing scaffolding without a means of egress, and the Crossbraces were used as a means of access.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2022
Abate by
Apr 4, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,865 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  On or about February 8, 2022, on the Northeast side of the site employees were performing masonry work on the outside of a building utilizing scaffolding that had not been inspected by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1865

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section.   On or about February 8, 2022, on the northeast of the site, employees were performing masonry work on a scaffold at a height greater than ten (10) feet, without proper fall protection or an appropriate guardrail system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy, or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall.  On or about February 8, 2022, on the Northeast side of the site employees were performing masonry work utilizing scaffolding that had no means of protecting employees from falling objects, tools or other materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4351

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345769202.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.