Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROMA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ROMA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in 1259 WAMPANOAG TRAIL, RIVERSIDE, RI 02915 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 345773758.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Roma Construction Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Roma Construction Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1259 WAMPANOAG TRAIL
City
RIVERSIDE
State
RI
ZIP
02915
Mailing
630 PLAINFIELD ROAD, JEWETT CITY, CT 06351
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
200
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2022
Abate by
Nov 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $9,324 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 2/10/2022, employees were not instructed in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions while working in an unprotected excavation of class "C" soil.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $500
  • — C (S) $9324
  • — Z (S) $9324

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2022
Abate by
Nov 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $9,324 · Current $6,527 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 2/10/2022, employees were not protected from over-head hazards while working in an excavation in close proximity to the bucket of an excavator.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $6526.8
  • — C (S) $9324
  • — Z (S) $9324

1926.651 K01

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2022
Abate by
Nov 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,052 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins or indications of failure of protective systems:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 2/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that an adequate daily inspection of the excavation took place to address possible cave-in hazards before employees entered and worked within the excavation of class "C" soil.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $800
  • — C (S) $13052
  • — Z (S) $13052

1926.652 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2022
Abate by
Nov 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,052 · Current $9,451 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652 (b) or (c):  (a) Worksite:  On or about 2/10/2022, employees were not protected from cave-in or collapse hazards while working in an excavation approximately 6.5 feet in depth.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $9451.4
  • — C (S) $13052
  • — Z (S) $13052

1926.652 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2022
Abate by
Apr 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.652(b): The slopes and configurations of sloping and benching systems were not in accordance with the requirement options of 29 CFR 1926.652(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), or (b)(4):  (a) Worksite:  On or about 2/10/2022, the employer did not ensure that an appropriate sloping design, or trench box, was used to protect employees from excavation cave-in hazards in type "C" soil.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345773758.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.