PARSIPPANY, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: WM. STEINEN MFG. CO.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of WM. STEINEN MFG. CO. in 29 EAST HALSEY ROAD, PARSIPPANY, NJ 07054 (NAICS 332919). OSHA activity number 345783427.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WM. STEINEN MFG. CO.
- Site address
- 29 EAST HALSEY ROAD
- City
- PARSIPPANY
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07054
- Mailing
- 29 EAST HALSEY ROAD, PARSIPPANY, NJ 07054
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332919
- Employees
- 40
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $7,252 · Current $7,252
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a) Facility An employee (not provided a 2020 and 2021 audiometric exam) operating the screw machine was exposed to continuous noise levels that were equivalent to 107.4% of the allowable dose of 40% for a 10 hour time weighted average. Exposures equivalent to a 10 hour Time Weighted Average of 90.5 dBA exceeded the Action Level of 83.4 dBA. The sample time was 571 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 55 minutes. An employee (not provided a 2020 and 2021 audiometric exam) operating the punch press was exposed to continuous noise levels that were equivalent to 92.9% of the allowable dose of 50% for 8 hour time weighted average. Exposures equivalent to an 8 hour Time Weighted Average of 89.4 dBA exceeded the Action Level of 85 dBA. The sample time was 392 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 88 minutes. Violation occurred on or about 03/29/2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $7252
1910.95 G06
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $7,252 · Current $7,252
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6): At least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels : a) Facility An annual audiogram was not obtained for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels and employees exposed at or above an 10.5-hour time-weighted average of 83.4 dBA. An employee (not provided a 2020 and 2021 audiometric exam) operating the screw machine was exposed to continuous noise levels that were equivalent to 107.4%, allowable dose of 40% for a 10 hour time weighted average. Exposures equivalent to a 10 hour Time Weighted Average of 90.5 dBA exceeded the Action Level of 83.4 dBA. The sample time was 571 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 59 minutes. An employee (not provided a 2020 and 2021 audiometric exam) operating the punch press was exposed to continuous noise levels that were equivalent to 92.9% of the allowable dose of 50% for 8 hour time weighted average. Exposures equivalent to a 8 hour Time Weighted Average of 89.4 dBA exceeded the Action Level of 85 dBA. The sample time was 392 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled time period of 88 minutes. Violation occurred on or about 03/29/2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $7252
1910.1052 H01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2022
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $7,252 · Current $7,252
1730
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(h)(1): Where needed to prevent methylene chloride induced skin or eye irritation, the employer did not provide clean protective clothing and equipment resistant to methylene chloride, at no cost to the employee, and/or did not ensure that each affected employee used it: a) Facility The employer did not provide and ensure employees wore protective clothing and eye protection when using methylene chloride during vapor degreasing operations. Violation occurred 03/29/2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $7252
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2022
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $7,252 · Current $7,252
1730
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Facility The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, methylene chloride used as a degreaser and H&B Petroleum Company's 250 Cutting Oil used during screw machine operations. Violation occurred on or about 03/29/2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $7252
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2022
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1730
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Facility The employer did not provide information and training for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, methylene chloride used during vapor degreaser machine operations and H&B Petroleum Company's 250 Cutting Oil used during screw machine operations. Violation occurred on or about 03/29/2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1052 K01 I
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2022
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1730
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(k)(1)(i): The employer did not comply with all requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (1910.1200) for MC: a) Facility The employer did not comply with the hazard communication standard to include but not limited to implementing a written hazard communication program and training workers on the hazards of methylene chloride used during vapor degreaser operations. Violation occurred on 03/29/2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1052 L01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2022
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1730
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(l)(1): The employer did not provide information and training for each affected employee prior to or at the time of initial assignment to a job involving potential exposure to methylene chloride: a) Facility The employer did not provide information and training to employees who work with methylene chloride during vapor degreaser operations. Violation occurred on 3/29/2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1052 D02
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1730
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(2): The employer did not perform initial monitoring to determine each employee's exposure to methylene chloride: a) Facility The employer did not perform initial monitoring for employees using methylene chloride as a vapor degreaser in the methylene chloride vapor degreaser machine. Violation occurred on 03/29/2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at WM. Steinen MFG. CO.
View WM. Steinen MFG. CO.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332919)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345783427.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.