Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CONTRACTING BY TITAN, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CONTRACTING BY TITAN, INC. in 1380 HOOKSETT RD., HOOKSETT, NH 03106 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 345787634.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Contracting by Titan, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Contracting by Titan, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1380 HOOKSETT RD.
City
HOOKSETT
State
NH
ZIP
03106
Mailing
275 FAIRVIEW AVE, REHOBOTH, MA 02769
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2022
Abate by
May 11, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    Jobsite - On or about February 16, 2022, a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where there were slip, trip & fall hazards from steel building components laid out on the ground and bent over re-bar in doorway sections of the foundation. Additionally, there were potential impalement hazards from exposed bolting rod in various locations around the foundation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2022
Abate by
May 11, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2):The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person.  Jobsite - On or about February 16, 2022, The employer did not perform frequent and regular site inspections where there were slip, trip, fall and potential impalement hazards present.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2022
Abate by
May 11, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  Jobsite - On or about February 16, 2022, the employer did not instruct employees in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions or the methods to control or eliminate them where there were slip, trip, fall and potential impalement hazards present on the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.752 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 29, 2022
Abate by
May 11, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.752(b): The steel erection contractor began steel erection work without written notification that the concrete in the footings, piers and wall, or the mortar  in the masonry piers and walls has attained, on the basis of an appropriate ASTM standard test method of field-cured samples, either 75 percent of the intended minimum compressive design strength or sufficient strength to support the loads imposed during steel erection.  Jobsite - On or about February 16, 2022, the steel erection contractor began erecting the 75 X 155 foot system-engineered steel building without obtaining written notification that the concrete had obtained 75 percent of the intended minimum compressive strength or sufficient strength to support the loads during steel erection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345787634.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.