Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: US ORAL SURGERY MANAGEMENT, LLC / CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, P.C.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of US ORAL SURGERY MANAGEMENT, LLC / CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, P.C. in 2 JUNGLE ROAD, LEOMINSTER, MA 01453 (NAICS 621210). OSHA activity number 345800452.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch US Oral Surgery Management, LLC / Central Massachusetts Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, P.C. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for US Oral Surgery Management, LLC / Central Massachusetts Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, P.C. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2 JUNGLE ROAD
City
LEOMINSTER
State
MA
ZIP
01453
Mailing
2 JUNGLE ROAD, LEOMINSTER, MA 01453
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621210
Employees
23
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2022
Abate by
Oct 3, 2022
Penalty
Initial $5,801 · Current $3,480 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  Facility at 2 Jungle Rd, Leominster MA: On or about January 20, 2022, and ongoing, a written respiratory protection program addressing the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) was not established and implemented to ensure employee protection from exposure to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) during tasks when an N-95 respirator use was when required including, but not limited to, performing aerosol generating procedures and the use of commonly used dental equipment known to create aerosols and airborne contamination e.g. ultrasonic scaler, high-speed dental handpiece, air/water syringes, air polishing and air abrasion.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3480
  • — Z (S) $5801

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2022
Abate by
Oct 3, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use an N-95 respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   Facility at 2 Jungle Rd, Leominster MA: On or about January 20, 2022, and ongoing, employees required to wear respirators during tasks when respirator use was mandated including, but not limited to, performing aerosol generating procedures and the use of commonly used dental equipment known to create aerosols and airborne contamination e.g. ultrasonic scaler, high-speed dental handpiece, air/water syringes, air polishing and air abrasion, were not medically evaluated for their ability to use an N-95 respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2022
Abate by
Oct 3, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employer did not ensure that employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  In the facility at 2 Jungle Rd, Leominster MA: On or about January 20, 2022, and ongoing, employees were required to wear N-95 respirators during tasks when respirator use was mandated including, but not limited to, performing aerosol generating procedures and the use of commonly used dental equipment known to create aerosols and airborne contamination e.g. ultrasonic scaler, high-speed dental handpiece, air/water syringes, air polishing and air abrasion, and the employer did not ensure that employees had been fit tested prior to initial use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345800452.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.