Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COMPLETE AUTO COLLISION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COMPLETE AUTO COLLISION in 11990 ROSEANN COURT, EL PASO, TX 79936 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 345821383.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Complete Auto Collision — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Complete Auto Collision is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11990 ROSEANN COURT
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79936
Mailing
11990 ROSEANN COURT, EL PASO, TX 79936
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2022
Abate by
Oct 24, 2022
Penalty
Initial $349 · Current $349
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  On or about September 19, 2022 the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for Citation 1 Item 1 A, B, C and D issued on June 24, 2022 with an abatement date of August 30, 2022.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $349

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2022
Abate by
Jul 29, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,729 · Current $3,729
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about March 7, 2022, the employer did not provide a respirator protection program for required respirator use for employees.  Employees may be exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3729

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2022
Abate by
Jul 29, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about March 7, 2021, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employer was allowed to use a respirator.  The employee may be exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2022
Abate by
Jul 29, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  On or about March 7, 2022, the employer did not ensure that an employee required to use a respirator was fit tested prior to allowing him to use it.  Employee may be exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2022
Abate by
Jul 14, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:  On or about March 7, 2022, the employer did not provide a place to store a respirator to protect it from damage, contamination, or dust.  Employee may be exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2022
Abate by
Jul 29, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k)(1):The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):  On or about March 7, 2022, the employer did not provide respirator training  to his employee.  Employee may be exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.106 A32

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2022
Abate by
Jul 14, 2022
Penalty
Initial $2,486 · Current $2,486
29 CFR  1910.106(a)(32):29CFR 1910.106(a)(32) The employer did not ensure that flammable liquids were stored in a container that complies with paragraph (d)(2) of this section.  On or about March 7, 2022, the employer did not ensure flammable liquids were stored in a container that complies with OSHA requirements.  Employees may be exposed to fire hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2486

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2022
Abate by
Jul 7, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,865 · Current $1,865
29 CFR  1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:  On or about March 7, 2022, the portable fire extinguishers were not mounted for easy access in case of use.  The employees may be exposed to fire hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1865

1910.157 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2022
Abate by
Jul 14, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.157(e)(1): The employer was not responsible for the inspection, maintenance, and testing of all portable fire extinguishers in the workplace:  On or about March 7,  2022, the employer did not have the fire extinguisher inspected on a regular basis.  Employees may be exposed to fire hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2022
Abate by
Jul 14, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,865 · Current $1,865
29 CFR  1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:  On or about March 7, 2022, employees were using flexible cords as a substitute for fixed wiring.  Employees may be exposed to electrical hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1865

View Complete Auto Collision's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345821383.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.