OSHA Inspection: GABRIEL TENORE

Issued

Aug 16, 2022

Abate by

Aug 29, 2022

Penalty

Initial $349 · Current $349

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   Location:  200 Danbury Road, Wilton, Connecticut  Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 1; Citation 001, Item 2; Citation 001, Item 3;  Citation 001, Item 4 and  Citation 002, Item 1 with a final order date of 6/22/2022  was not received within 10 calendar days (by 7/1/2022) following the abatement due date (6/21/2022).

Issued

May 24, 2022

Abate by

Jun 21, 2022

Penalty

Initial $3,729 · Current $3,729

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii).  Worksite: The employer did not have a written hazardous communication program (HazCom) for any chemicals including but not limited to gasoline and mortar/concrete mix that were used by employees.

Issued

May 24, 2022

Abate by

Jun 21, 2022

Penalty

Initial $3,729 · Current $3,729

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use.  Worksite: The employer did not maintain and have available Safety Data Sheets (SDS) at the worksite for chemicals that were used by employees such as but not limited to gasoline and mortar/concrete mix.

Issued

May 24, 2022

Abate by

Jun 21, 2022

Penalty

Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to use gas powered demolition saws to cut stone were provided with and required to wear eye protection.

Issued

May 24, 2022

Abate by

Jun 21, 2022

Penalty

Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1153(c)(1):For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to use gas powered demolition saws to cut stone were equipped with an integrated water delivery system that continuously fed water to the blade of the saw.

Issued

May 24, 2022

Abate by

Jun 21, 2022

Penalty

Initial $622 · Current $622

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1904.29(a):The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent.  Establishment: The employer did not maintain OSHA 300 Work Related Logs of Injury and Illnesses or the OSHA 300-A summary for any recordable injuries or illnesses.