Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DANIEL AND SONS CONSTRUCTION LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DANIEL AND SONS CONSTRUCTION LLC in 204 SCOTT-TROY RD., O FALLON, IL 62269 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345842892.

Watch Daniel AND Sons Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Daniel AND Sons Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
204 SCOTT-TROY RD.
City
O FALLON
State
IL
ZIP
62269
Mailing
202 S BROADWAY, ALBERS, IL 62215
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Deleted Other-than-serious 5 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $349.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1):The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $349

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4351.00 · Current $3263.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were not protected from fall and struck-by hazards associated with truss collapse:  A. On or about March 4, 2022, workers installed trusses on a new commercial construction without diagonal bracing, exposing workers to the potential of truss collapse.  B.  On or about March 16, 2022, workers installed trusses on a new commercial construction without diagonal bracing, exposing workers to the potential of truss collapse.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3263
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.502 D06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4351.00 · Current $3263.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(6)(i): A snaphook not of the locking type was engaged (i) directly to webbing, rope or wire rope; (ii) to each other (iii) to a Dee-ring to which another snaphook or other connector is attached;(iv) to a horizontal lifeline; or (v) to any object which is incompatibly shaped or dimensioned in relation to the snaphook such that unintentional disengagement could occur by the connected object being able to depress the snaphook keeper and release itself.   On or about March 16, 2022, the employer did not ensure that snaphooks, used on a personal fall arrest system was not wrapped through a roof truss and connected back to the lifeline rope.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3263
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person.  On or about March 16, 2022, the employer did not ensure that anchor points were installed to support at least 5,000 pounds per employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:   On or about March 16, 2022, the employer did not ensure that fall arrest systems were installed in a manner that prevented employees from falling more than six (6) foot.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Willful Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $29005.00 · Current $14503.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1):Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  A.  On or about March 16, 2022, two workers were framing and setting trusses at a height of approximately 10 feet and were not protected from falling by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.  B.  On or about March 21, 2022, three workers were sheeting trusses at a height of approximately 10 feet and were not protected from falling by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (W) $14503
  • — Z (W) $29005

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345842892.