O FALLON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: DANIEL AND SONS CONSTRUCTION LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DANIEL AND SONS CONSTRUCTION LLC in 204 SCOTT-TROY RD., O FALLON, IL 62269 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345842892.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DANIEL AND SONS CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 204 SCOTT-TROY RD.
- City
- O FALLON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62269
- Mailing
- 202 S BROADWAY, ALBERS, IL 62215
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $349.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $349
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4351.00 · Current $3263.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were not protected from fall and struck-by hazards associated with truss collapse: A. On or about March 4, 2022, workers installed trusses on a new commercial construction without diagonal bracing, exposing workers to the potential of truss collapse. B. On or about March 16, 2022, workers installed trusses on a new commercial construction without diagonal bracing, exposing workers to the potential of truss collapse.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3263
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.502 D06 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4351.00 · Current $3263.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(i): A snaphook not of the locking type was engaged (i) directly to webbing, rope or wire rope; (ii) to each other (iii) to a Dee-ring to which another snaphook or other connector is attached;(iv) to a horizontal lifeline; or (v) to any object which is incompatibly shaped or dimensioned in relation to the snaphook such that unintentional disengagement could occur by the connected object being able to depress the snaphook keeper and release itself. On or about March 16, 2022, the employer did not ensure that snaphooks, used on a personal fall arrest system was not wrapped through a roof truss and connected back to the lifeline rope.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3263
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person. On or about March 16, 2022, the employer did not ensure that anchor points were installed to support at least 5,000 pounds per employee.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D16 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: On or about March 16, 2022, the employer did not ensure that fall arrest systems were installed in a manner that prevented employees from falling more than six (6) foot.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $29005.00 · Current $14503.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: A. On or about March 16, 2022, two workers were framing and setting trusses at a height of approximately 10 feet and were not protected from falling by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. B. On or about March 21, 2022, three workers were sheeting trusses at a height of approximately 10 feet and were not protected from falling by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (W) $14503
- — Z (W) $29005
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
FAIRHOPE, AL—2026-07-16
FRANCISCO ARES
WOODHAVEN, MI—2026-07-16
G.J. PERELLI CO., L.L.C.
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
BERLIN, NJ—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-15
TRIPLE R CONSTRUCTION LLC
More inspections in IL
DEERFIELD, IL—2026-07-16
JOHN BURNS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
BUILDER SERVICES GROUP, INC. DBA CJ INSULATION
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
HIGHLAND PARK, IL—2026-07-16
UNITED PLUMBING AND DRAIN, INC.
FRANKLIN PARK, IL—2026-07-16
B & M PLASTIC INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345842892.