Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RAMOS DESIGN BUILD CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RAMOS DESIGN BUILD CORPORATION in 946 HIGHLANDS AVENUE GC CONSTRUCTION TRAILER/ 936 HOWARD AVENUE, DUNEDIN, FLORIDA, 34698., DUNEDIN, FL 34698 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 345843551.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ramos Design Build Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ramos Design Build Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
946 HIGHLANDS AVENUE GC CONSTRUCTION TRAILER/ 936 HOWARD AVENUE, DUNEDIN, FLORIDA, 34698.
City
DUNEDIN
State
FL
ZIP
34698
Mailing
504 S. MOODY AVENUE SUITE 400, TAMPA, FL 33609
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2022
Abate by
May 24, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $2,486 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part:  a. On or about March 17, 2022, the employer failed to initiate and maintain safety, health, and accident prevention programs, to include, frequent and regular inspections of the job site, the materials, and the equipment to be made by competent persons, during which time employees were found to have been working on the third floor without fall protection and cutting cinder blocks without respiratory protection; therefore exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2486.4
  • — Z (S) $4144

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2022
Abate by
May 24, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  a. On or about March 17, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that a competent person conducted frequent and regular safety inspections of the jobsite, the equipment, and the materials, during which time employees were found to have been working on the third floor without fall protection and cutting cinder blocks without respiratory protection; therefore, exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B02 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2022
Abate by
May 24, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $2,486 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(2)(i): Each employee who was constructing a leading edge 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Note: If the employer could demonstrate that it was infeasible or created a greater hazard to use these systems, a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502 should have been developed and implemented.   a. On or about March 16, 2022, employees were exposed to an approximate 22-foot fall hazard while constructing a leading edge/ installing tongue and groove floor sheathing, in that, fall protection was not used.   b. On or about March 16, 2022, employees were exposed to an approximate 22-foot fall hazard while installing rebar across the top of the existing sections of vertical rebar along the perimeter of the third floor to serve as a guardrail, in that, fall protection was not used during the installation of the rebar.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2486.4
  • — Z (S) $4144

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345843551.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.