Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BR PARGEON REMODELING

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BR PARGEON REMODELING in 216 MARGUERITE AVENUE, SYRACUSE, NY 13207 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 345862486.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch BR Pargeon Remodeling — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BR Pargeon Remodeling is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
216 MARGUERITE AVENUE
City
SYRACUSE
State
NY
ZIP
13207
Mailing
515 COUNTY ROUTE 12, PENNELLVILLE, NY 13132
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2022
Abate by
Jul 18, 2022
Penalty
Initial $349 · Current $349
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):  The employer failed to certify to OSHA (the Agency) that the following item(s) were abated within 10 calendar days after the abatement date:  a) As of 7/5/2022, the employer has not provided abatement certification for the following previously cited violations:  -Citation 1, Item 1  b) As of 7/5/2022, the employer has not provided abatement certification for the following previously cited violations:   -Citation 1, Item 3b
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $349

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2022
Abate by
Apr 20, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,554 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to the work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a) At 216 Marguerite Ave., Syracuse, NY., on or about 3/29/2022: The employer did not train workers to recognize and avoid electrical hazards when when working in proximity to electrical/service power lines while reroofing.   b) At 216 Marguerite Ave., Syracuse, NY., on or about 3/29/2022: The employer did not train workers to recognize and avoid electrical hazards when working in proximity to electrical/service power lines while utilizing aluminum extension ladders to access and egress the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1554
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.403 I02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,554 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.403(i)(2)(i): Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by cabinets or other forms of enclosures, nor by any of the means listed in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of this paragraph:  a) At 216 Marguerite Ave., Syracuse, NY., on or about 3/29/22:  Employees were permitted to perform roofing work without ensuring electrical power service lines were isolated or guarded against accidental contact.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1554
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,554 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    a) At 216 Marguerite Ave., Syracuse, NY., on or about 3/29/2022: The employer permitted workers to perform reroofing operations while exposed to the hazard of falling approximately 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1554
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.503 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2022
Abate by
Apr 20, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii):   a) At 216 Marguerite Avenue, Syracuse, NY.,:  The employer had not assured that each employee had been trained, as necessary, by a competent person qualified in fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $2,486 · Current $1,243 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(9): The employer did not ensure the area around the top and bottom of ladders were kept clear.  a) At 216 Marguerite Ave., Syracuse, NY:  The area around the bottom of the ladder used to access and egress the roof was not kept clear as required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1243
  • — Z (S) $2486

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identified them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired:  a) At 216 Marguerite Ave., Syracuse, NY., on or about 3/29/2022: An aluminum extension ladder with a damaged rung was used to access/egress the roof located at 10 feet above the  ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345862486.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.