LAFAYETTE, LA —
OSHA Inspection: ARMOUR FRAMING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARMOUR FRAMING in 105 READING AVE., LAFAYETTE, LA 70506 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345873129.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARMOUR FRAMING
- Site address
- 105 READING AVE.
- City
- LAFAYETTE
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70506
- Mailing
- 266 KIRBY COURT, SUGAR HILL, GA 30518
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,972 · Current $4,972
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents: On or about March 1, 2022, at building #5, employee(s), engaged in framing work activities, were using pneumatic nail guns without adequate eye protection. This exposed the employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4972
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $5,801 · Current $5,801
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). On or about March 1, 2022, at building #5, employees were engaged in framing operations and were not in use of fall protection. This exposed the employees to a fall greater than six(6) feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5801
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii): On or about March 1, 2022, employees were working from heights and were not trained by a qualified competent person to recognize the hazards of falls. This exposed the employees to a fall hazard greater than six(6) feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345873129.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.