Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ESTEBAN GASPAR VELASCO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ESTEBAN GASPAR VELASCO in 5806 PENNY FLOWER COURT, WESTERVILLE, OH 43081 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345941579.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Esteban Gaspar Velasco — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Esteban Gaspar Velasco is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5806 PENNY FLOWER COURT
City
WESTERVILLE
State
OH
ZIP
43081
Mailing
3512 DERRER HILL DR, COLUMBUS, OH 43204
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 26, 2022
Abate by
Oct 6, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or about May 5, 2022, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from falls while engaged in residential construction activities. Employees conducted roofing activities without being provided a fall protection/prevention system, thereby exposing them to fall hazards of over 11 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345941579.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.