CYPRESS, TX —
OSHA Inspection: GLENDA LAINEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GLENDA LAINEZ in 15303 DWIGHT EISENHOWER DR., CYPRESS, TX 77433 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345941942.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GLENDA LAINEZ
- Site address
- 15303 DWIGHT EISENHOWER DR.
- City
- CYPRESS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77433
- Mailing
- 8931 JACKWOOD ST., HOUSTON, TX 77036
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 26, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $1,865 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. On or about May 6, 2022, employees were exposed to flying particles while operating a pneumatic nail gun without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1864.8
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 26, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $1,865 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). On or about May 6, 2022, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of more than 6 feet while working on the roof without a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1864.8
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 26, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $1,865 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. On or about May 6, 2022, the employees were exposed to a fall hazard when accessing the southeastern roof with a ladder whose side rails did not extend at least three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1864.8
- — Z (S) $3108
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345941942.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.