APPLETON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE I CONTRERAS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE I CONTRERAS in 5117 NORTH WATERFORD DRIVE, APPLETON, WI 54913 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345969240.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE I CONTRERAS
- Site address
- 5117 NORTH WATERFORD DRIVE
- City
- APPLETON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54913
- Mailing
- 3518 CASA RIDGE, MESQUITE, TX 75150
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. On or about May 19, 2022, at the worksite located at 5117 North Waterford Drive, Appleton, WI 54913, the employer did not ensure that each employee working on a roof was protected from falls, exposing employees to fall hazards. The eave height of the roof was greater than 9 feet and the roof pitch was approximately 5/12. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
More inspections at Jose I Contreras
View Jose I Contreras's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345969240.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.