WINTHROP, ME —
OSHA Inspection: KATAHDIN STREAM PARTNERS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KATAHDIN STREAM PARTNERS, INC. in 61 MAIN ST A, WINTHROP, ME 04364 (NAICS 561740). OSHA activity number 345975544.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KATAHDIN STREAM PARTNERS, INC.
- Site address
- 61 MAIN ST A
- City
- WINTHROP
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04364
- Mailing
- 29 BRICKYARD CIRCLE, AUBURN, ME 04210
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561740
- Employees
- 24
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C11
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,144 · Current $2,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(11): The employer did not ensure that portable ladders used to gain access to an upper landing surface that have side rails that extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface. Winthrop House of Pizza Work Site - The employer did not ensure that employees used ladders in a configuration that allowed rails to extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2900.8
- — Z (S) $4144
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $5,801 · Current $4,061 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Establishment - The employer did not ensure that employees had adequate means of fall protection on a surface that was 7 feet in height from the edge.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4060.7
- — Z (S) $5801
1910.30 A03
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $5,801 · Current $4,061 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.30(a)(3): The employer did not train each employee in at least the following topics listed in 1910.30(a)(3)(i)-(iv). Establishment - The employer did not provide adequate training for each employee who uses personal fall protection systems or who is required to be trained in topics including, but not limited to; proper hook-up, anchoring and tie off techniques, methods of equipment storage and the nature of fall hazards in the work area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4060.7
- — Z (S) $5801
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,486 · Current $1,740 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: Establishment - The employer did not provide a sufficient workplace hazard assessment which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment or the person certifying the evaluation for workplace hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1740.2
- — Z (S) $2486
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,144 · Current $2,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Establishment - The employer failed to perform medical evaluations as required before employees used mandatory, 3M full face fitted respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2900.8
- — Z (S) $4144
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,144 · Current $2,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): Establishment - The employer did not conduct fit tests prior to use for employees using mandatory, fitted, 3M full face respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2900.8
- — Z (S) $4144
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,972 · Current $3,480 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met. Establishment - The employer did not maintain an effective written hazard communication program which described how sections (f), (g), and (h) of 1910.1200 for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training would be met. Their written hazard communication program did not contain a list of hazardous chemicals known to be present in the workplace such as but not limited to caustic chemical RN Craft Inc. Hood and Vent cleaner, the sixteen sections of a Safety Data Sheet, or pictograms.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3480.4
- — Z (S) $4972
More inspections at Katahdin Stream Partners, INC.
View Katahdin Stream Partners, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561740)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345975544.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.