Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RUPRECHT COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RUPRECHT COMPANY in 1301 ALLANSON RD., MUNDELEIN, IL 60060 (NAICS 311613). OSHA activity number 345978266.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ruprecht Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ruprecht Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RUPRECHT COMPANY
Site address
1301 ALLANSON RD.
City
MUNDELEIN
State
IL
ZIP
60060
Mailing
1301 ALLANSON RD., MUNDELEIN, IL 60060
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311613
Employees
518
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2022
Penalty
Initial $8,287 · Current $5,801 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to items (a) through (d) of this section:   a) Production Area - On or about June 8, 2022, the employer did not ensure that the energy control procedures that were established, were specific to the equipment such as the Multivac T800, and the ADCO machine, model #15D-10 SS, serial #6226HG, where it clearly outlined the following: a specific statement of the intended use of the procedure (servicing, maintenance, and/or un-jamming), procedural steps for shutting down, isolating and securing the machine to control hazardous energy (electrical, and pneumatic), procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them, and specific requirements for testing the machine to determine and verify the effectiveness of the lockout devices, tagout devices and other energy control measures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5800.9
  • — Z (S) $8287

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 4, 2022
Abate by
Dec 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) covered the following elements, however, the actions were not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147 (d)(1)-(6):  a) Production Area - On or about June 7, 2022, employee was exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts while  unjamming when the meat is to frozen on the ADCO machine, model #15D-105-SS, serial #6226HG.  The employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work such as unjamming meat from the conveyor line [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements].  As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect the employee from machine servicing hazards.  b) Production Area - On or about June 8, 2022, employee was exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts while doing a set up for a product line change on the Multi-Vac Machine#3, and the ADCO machine, model #15D-105-SS, serial #6226HG, and to troubleshoot with a problem with the glue.  The employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work such as troubleshooting the glue applicator [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements].  As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect the employee from machine servicing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Ruprecht Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345978266.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.