OSHA Inspection: SERGIO RAMOS

Issued

Jun 17, 2022

Abate by

Jun 30, 2022

Penalty

Initial $2,486 · Current $2,486

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.  a)  At 3219 Calder Court, Lot 221 Churchill, Spanish Fort, Alabama:  On May 24, 2022, the employer allowed his employees to operate pneumatic nail guns without eye protection while performing framing activities exposing his employees to struck-by hazards.

Issued

Jun 17, 2022

Abate by

Jun 30, 2022

Penalty

Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a)  At 3219 Calder Court, Lot 221 Churchill, Spanish Fort, Alabama:  On or about May 24, 2022 and at times prior, the employer allowed his employees to perform framing activities without fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of up to 22 feet 4 inches to the ground below.

Issued

Jun 17, 2022

Abate by

Jun 30, 2022

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   a)  At 3219 Calder Court, Lot 221 Churchill, Spanish Fort, Alabama:  On or about May 24, 2022 and at times prior, the employer allowed his employees to perform framing activities without first ensuring his employees were trained on the hazards associated with falls to include but not limited to setting up and inspecting fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of up to 22 feet 4 inches to the ground below.

Issued

Jun 17, 2022

Abate by

Jun 30, 2022

Penalty

Initial $2,486 · Current $2,486

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    a)  At 3219 Calder Court, Lot 221 Churchill, Spanish Fort, Alabama:  On May 24, 2022, the employer allowed his employees to use an extension ladder to gain access the second level of the house and the rails of the ladder did not extend three feet above the landing area to provide safe access exposing his employees to a fall hazard of up to 8 feet 2 inches to the ground below.