Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GREAT VOYAGE INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GREAT VOYAGE INC in 12 SIMON STREET SUITE 5, NASHUA, NH 03060 (NAICS 811219). OSHA activity number 345985212.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Great Voyage INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Great Voyage INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GREAT VOYAGE INC
Site address
12 SIMON STREET SUITE 5
City
NASHUA
State
NH
ZIP
03060
Mailing
12 SIMON STREET SUITE 5, NASHUA, NH 03060
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811219
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

19 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Abate by
Dec 6, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,315 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:   Site- Employees were not protected from fire and entrapment hazards where exit routes were not kept free and unobstructed including the exit access and exit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $3315

1910.37 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Abate by
Dec 6, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,315 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.37(b)(4): The line-of-sight to exit signs were not clearly be visible at all times:  Site- Employees were not protected from fire and entrapment hazards where exit signs above exits were not visible due to stored material blocking the line of sight to the signs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3315

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Abate by
Dec 6, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:  Site- Employees were not protected from fire and entrapment hazards fire extinguishers were not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $4144

1910.303 A

Serious Gravity 10 50 instances 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Abate by
Dec 6, 2022
Penalty
Initial $5,801 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.303(a): The conductors and/or equipment required or permitted by this subpart were not approved:  Site- Employees were not protected from fire and electrical shock hazards where 220-volt relocatable power taps used at the site were not approved by a nationally recognized testing laboratory.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5801

1910.304 B02 V

Serious Gravity 10 50 instances 22 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Abate by
Dec 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.304(b)(2)(v): Receptacles connected to circuits having different voltages, frequencies, or types of current (ac or dc) on the same premises were not of such design that the attachment plugs used on these circuits are not interchangeable.   Site- Employees were not protected from electric shock and burns where 220-volt relocatable power taps, that were not approved by a nationally recognized testing laboratory, were in service and had the ability to accept a 110-volt attachment plug for 110-volt cord and plug connected equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Abate by
Dec 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $5,801 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:   Site- Employees were not protected from electric shock where circuit breakers in panel boards were not marked to indicate their purpose. Electrical equipment that was not approved by a nationally recognized testing laboratory and had physical damage including; but not limited to; burns, melted plastic, and broken components was in service at the time of the inspection and could not be disconnected in a timely manner in the event of an emergency due to their disconnecting means not being legibly marked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5801

1910.303 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:  Site- Employees were not protected from electric shock and trip hazards where electric disconnects and a three phase panel board, to the left of the loading dock, were blocked and not accessible due to stored piles of cardboard. Electrical equipment being powered by the panel board was not rated by a nationally recognized testing laboratory and had physical damage including, but not limited to; burns, melted plastic, and broken components which was in service at the time of the inspection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $4144

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 5 10 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Abate by
Dec 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective:  Site- Employees were not protected from electric shock where branch circuits providing power to 220-volt outlet receptacles in the repair department were not grounded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $4144

1910.305 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.305(b)(1)(i): Conductors entering cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not protected from abrasions:  Site- Employees were not protected from electric shock and burns where conductors entering the panel board adjacent to the overhead door did not have protective sheathing to prevent abrasions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.305(b)(1)(iii): Cable was not secured to the cabinet, cutout box, or meter socket enclosure:   Site- Employees were not protected from electric shock where cable entering the panel board near the overhead door were not secured to the panel board with fittings.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  a. Site- Employees were not protected from electric shock and burns where knockouts in the panel board near the overhead door were removed and not effectively closed.  b. Site- Employees were not protected from electric shock and burns where unused openings for circuit breakers in the panel board near the overhead door were not covered and live parts were exposed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4144

1910.304 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Abate by
Dec 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.304(f)(1)(i):Conductors and equipment were not protected from overcurrent in accordance with their ability to safely conduct current:  Site- Employees were not protected from electric shock and burns where branch circuit conductors were not compatible with the overcurrent protection from the circuit breaker which they were wired. Circuit breakers rated for 30, 40, and 60 amps; providing overcurrent protection to 220-volt outlet receptacles in all three panel boards located in the repair department; were installed using #12 wire and only rated for 20 amps.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $4144

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 10 50 instances 22 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Abate by
Dec 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $5,801 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):   a. Site- On or about May 26, 2022 employees were not protected from electric shock and burns where a Gowone, 32 amp, 220-volt, relocatable power tap was not inspected for defects prior to being placed into service. The relocatable power tap had burn marks on its attachment plug and the 220-volt outlet receptacle that it was plugged into was burned and melted where it had been overheated.   b. Site- Employees were not protected from electric shock and burns where the 220-volt relocatable power taps were not inspected for defects prior to being placed into service. All of the 220-volt relocatable power taps that were in service had the ability to accept a 110-volt attachment plug for 110-volt cord and plug connected equipment.  c. Site- Employees were not protected from electric shock and burns where relocatable power taps operating at 220-volts and 110-volts were not inspected for defects prior to being placed into service. Multiple relocatable power taps were in use with power cords that were damaged and did not provide strain relief at the attachment plug and/or the housing of the relocatable power tap.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5801

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 20 instances 22 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Abate by
Dec 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  Site- Employees were not protected from electric shock and burns where relocatable power taps operating at 220-volts and 110-volts were used with power cords that were damaged and did not provide strain relief at the attachment plug and/or the housing of the relocatable power tap.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4144

1910.334 A02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $5,801 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.334(a)(2)(ii): There was a defect or evidence of damage that could have exposed an employee to injury and the defective or damaged item was not removed from service and an employee was using it before repairs and tests necessary to render the equipment safe were made:   Site- On or about May 26, 2022 employees were not protected from electric shock and burns where a damaged Gowone, 32 amp, 250-volt, relocatable power tap was not removed from service before being repaired. The relocatable power tap had burn marks on its attachment plug and the 220-volt outlet receptacle that it was plugged into was burned and melted where it had been overheated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5801

1910.303 B07

Other-than-serious 30 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.303(b)(7): Electric equipment was not installed in a neat and workmanlike manner:   Site- Numerous 220-volt and 110-volt relocatable power taps were tangled together by their power cords on multiple work benches. Multiple 110-volt relocatable power taps were connected one to another to increase their length.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.304 A01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Abate by
Dec 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.304(a)(1)(i):A conductor used as a grounded conductor was not identifiable and distinguishable from all other conductors:  Site- The grounded conductor in the series of 110-volt outlet receptacles, placed on top of a set of work benches in the repair division, was not identifiable and distunguishable.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 G01 IV A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Abate by
Dec 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:  Site- Extension cords are used on a permanent basis to connect electrical equipment
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 G02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap:  Site- A VCT relocatable power tap in use at the time of the inspection had a power cord which was cut and spliced back together.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Great Voyage INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345985212.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.