FAIRFIELD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: CRAIG HENDERSON
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of CRAIG HENDERSON in 1073 NORTH BENSON ROAD, FAIRFIELD, CT 06824 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 345993836.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CRAIG HENDERSON
- Site address
- 1073 NORTH BENSON ROAD
- City
- FAIRFIELD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06824
- Mailing
- 19 WHITLOCK AVENUE, PLANTSVILLE, CT 06479
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2022
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $349 · Current $349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 1073 North Benson Road, Fairfield, Connecticut Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 01 and Citation 001, Item 02 with a final order date of 10/13/2022 was not received within 10 calendar days ( by 9/12/2022) following the abatement due date ( 9/2/2022).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $349
1926.501 B04 I
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2022
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i):Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights), more than six feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around such holes. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to perform masonry work from the roof of a commercial building were protected from falling through unguarded skylights. On or about May 31, 2022, an employee was fatality injured after falling through an unprotected skylight.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2022
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to work on the roof at a height above six feet were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3108
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345993836.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.