Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AZTEC FENCE AND ORNAMENTAL IRON

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AZTEC FENCE AND ORNAMENTAL IRON in 714 GUADALUPE ST., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78207 (NAICS 332323). OSHA activity number 345994743.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aztec Fence and Ornamental Iron — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aztec Fence and Ornamental Iron is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
714 GUADALUPE ST.
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78207
Mailing
714 GUADALUPE ST., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78207
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332323
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.157 C04

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,315 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.157(c)(4): The employer did not assure that portable fire extinguishers were maintained in a fully charged and operable condition and kept in their designated places at all times except during use:   On or about June 2, 2022, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fire hazard, while working in the shop without accessible fire extinguishers in their designated locations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $3315

1910.303 B07 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2022
Abate by
Sep 9, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,315 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.303(b)(7)(i): Unused openings in boxes, raceways, auxiliary gutters, cabinets, equipment cases, or housings were not effectively closed to afford protection substantially equivalent to the wall of the equipment:   On or about June 2, 2022, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to an electrical hazard, while working in the shop with an electrical panelbox that was missing breaker switches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $3315

1910.303 F02

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2022
Abate by
Sep 9, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.303(f)(2):  Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, unless located and arranged so the purpose is evident:   On or about June 2, 2022, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to an electrical hazard, while working in the shop with an electrical panelbox that did not have all switches labeled as to their use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2022
Abate by
Sep 9, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,315 · Current $2,550 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  On or about June 2, 2022, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards, while operating the Toyota forklift truck, without being trained and evaluated in its operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2550
  • — Z (S) $3315

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2022
Abate by
Sep 9, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(6):  The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l). The certification shall include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation:   On or about June 2, 2022, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards, while operating the Toyota forklift truck, without being trained or certified in its operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2022
Abate by
Sep 9, 2022
Penalty
Initial $2,486 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):  Employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:  On or about June 2, 2022, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not implement or maintain an effective written Hazard Communication Program to train and inform employees who handle, use, transport or are potentially exposed to hazards from chemicals and other hazardous materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2486

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345994743.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.