OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO YUPA MUGULEMA DBA ANTONIO YUPA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION

Issued

Oct 7, 2022

Penalty

Initial $2,735 · Current $2,735

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions:      a) On or about June 7, 2022, employees were not provided with appropriate foot protection to guard against punctures and lacerations to the feet when required to work on and in roofing debris containing nails.      No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.

Issued

Oct 7, 2022

Penalty

Initial $2,735 · Current $2,735

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a) On or about June 7, 2022, employees were exposed to eye injury while operating pneumatic nail guns without the benefit of eye protection.   No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.

Issued

Oct 7, 2022

Penalty

Initial $3,419 · Current $3,419

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilevered end:     a) On or about June 7, 2022, the work platform of the ladder jack scaffolding from which employees worked at an elevation of approximately 18 feet extended several feet over the scaffold end supports.  No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.

Issued

Oct 7, 2022

Penalty

Initial $4,786 · Current $4,786

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): Safe access was not provided to scaffold platforms when the platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access:    a) On or about June 7, 2022, employees were not provided with safe access to a ladder jack scaffolding at an elevation of approximately 18 feet.   No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.

Issued

Oct 7, 2022

Penalty

Initial $4,786 · Current $4,786

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:    a) On or about June 7, 2022, employees were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately 18 feet while working from ladder jack scaffolding without fall protection.  No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.

Issued

Oct 7, 2022

Penalty

Initial $4,786 · Current $4,786

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person:      a) On or about June 7, 2022, a metal plate anchor used as part of a fall protection system was not connected completely to the roof deck to ensure the device would be capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds of force per employee attached.  b) On or about June 7, 2022, two employees were connected to a metal plate anchor used as part of a fall protection system that was not connected completely to the roof deck to ensure the device would be capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds of force per employee attached.     No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.

Issued

Oct 7, 2022

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service:   a) On or about June 7, 2022, shock packs provided for employee use as part of personal fall arrest systems were not removed from service where wear, damage, and other deterioration was evident prior to use.   No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.

Issued

Oct 7, 2022

Penalty

Initial $4,786 · Current $4,786

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head:    a) On or about June 7, 2022, the front straps of body harnesses were used as attachment points for fall protection on pitched roof surfaces.    No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.

Issued

Oct 7, 2022

Penalty

Initial $5,469 · Current $5,469

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:    a) On or about June 7, 2022, employees were exposed to head injury while working without a protective helmet under and around areas where roofing work was being conducted above.  Antonio Yupa Mugulema dba Antonio Yupa Construction Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.100 (a) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1492763, citation 1, item 1, and was affirmed as a final order on June 15, 2021, with respect to a worksite located at 7342 Lakeside Drive, Frankfort, Illinois.    No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.

Issued

Oct 7, 2022

Penalty

Initial $23,928 · Current $23,928

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):    a) On or about June 7, 2022, employees were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately 20 feet while working without fall protection from pitched roof surfaces.  Antonio Yupa Mugulema DBA Antonio Yupa Construction Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501 (b)(13) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1492763, citation 2, item 1, and was affirmed as a final order on June 15, 2021, with respect to a worksite located at 7342 Lakeside Drive, Frankfort, Illinois.   Antonio Yupa Mugulema DBA Antonio Yupa Construction Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501 (b)(13) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1244974, citation 1, item 1, and was affirmed as a final order on October 3, 2017, with respect to a worksite located at 19500 Blyth Way, Mokena, Illinois.   Antonio Yupa Mugulema DBA Antonio Yupa Construction Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501 (b)(13) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1238260, citation 1, item 1, and was affirmed as a final order on October 3, 2017, with respect to a worksite located at 7615 Bookside Glen Drive, Tinley Park, Illinois.   No abatement certification or documentation required for this violation.