DENTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ROSE JAIME
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROSE JAIME in 3009 CONQUEST DRIVE, DENTON, TX 76207 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346015233.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROSE JAIME
- Site address
- 3009 CONQUEST DRIVE
- City
- DENTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76207
- Mailing
- 563 COUNTY ROAD 176, WHITESBORO, TX 76273
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.34 A
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.34(a):Building or structure exits were not so arranged and maintained as to provide free and unobstructed egress from all parts of the building or structure at all times when it was occupied. On or about June 13, 2022 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure that all floors of the occupied structure had safe and unobstructed access while the building was occupied by workers.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $1,865 · Current $1,865
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. On or about June 13, 2022 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure employees exposed to flying debris were provided with eye protection in the following instances: a) Three employees on the roof working with pneumatic nail guns and hand tools b) Two employees on the ground working with electric saws
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1865
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $1,865 · Current $1,865
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1):Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used. On or about June 13, 2022 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure frayed electrical cords were not being used to power electrical equipment being utilized by employees on site.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1865
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). On or about June 13, 2022 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure that employees actively performing residential construction duties more than six feet above the lower level were protected with a personal fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. On or about June 13, 2022 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure that employees tasked with working at heights and exposed to falls were trained via a program to instruct employees how to identify and mitigate fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Rose Jaime
View Rose Jaime's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346015233.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.