Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SPRINGFIELD WELDING AND MFG. CO., INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of SPRINGFIELD WELDING AND MFG. CO., INC. in 7265 WISCONSIN 19, WAUNAKEE, WI 53597 (NAICS 333992). OSHA activity number 346016181.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Springfield Welding and MFG. CO., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Springfield Welding and MFG. CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7265 WISCONSIN 19
City
WAUNAKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53597
Mailing
7265 WISCONSIN 19, WAUNAKEE, WI 53597
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333992
Employees
28
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.94 A02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Abate by
Jun 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $7,252 · Current $5,439 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR  1910.94(a)(2)(ii):The concentration of respirable dust or fume in the breathing zone of the abrasive-blasting operator or any other worker shall be kept below the levels specified in 1910.1000.  On June 13, 2022, employees' abrasive blasting respirable dust exposures exceeded 5.0 mg/3, as an 8-hour time weighted average.  a. An employee  engaged in abrasive blasting activities  on June 13, 2022, and was exposed to particles not otherwise regulated respriable fraction as an 8 hour time weighted average of 9.47 mg/m3, approximately 1.9 times the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 mg/m3; this limit was established to prevent adverse health effects.  The abrasive blaster used coal slag/glass mixture to abrasive blast media to blast various pieces of metal.  The exposure level was derived from three samples collected over 269 minutes, the remaining 211 minutes was calculated as zero (0) exposure time.  b.  An employee  engaged in abrasive blasting activities  on June 13, 2022, and was exposed to particles not otherwise regulated respriable fraction as an 8 hour time weighted average of 551.05 mg/m3, approximately 110 times the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 mg/m3; this limit was established to prevent adverse health effects.  The abrasive blaster used coal slag/glass mixture to abrasive blast media to blast various pieces of metal.  The exposure level was derived from three samples collected over 345 minutes, the remaining 135 minutes was calculated as zero (0) exposure time.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5439
  • — Z (S) $7252

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Abate by
Jun 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR  1910.1000(a)(2):Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of particles not otherwise regulated respriable fraction listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 5.0 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3):  On June 13, 2022, employees' abrasive blasting respirable dust exposures exceeded 5.0 mg/3, as an 8-hour time weighted average. a. An employee  engaged in abrasive blasting activities  on June 13, 2022, and was exposed to particles not otherwise regulated respriable fraction as an 8 hour time weighted average of 9.47 mg/m3, approximately 1.9 times the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 mg/m3; this limit was established to prevent adverse health effects.  The abrasive blaster used coal slag/glass mixture to abrasive blast media to blast various pieces of metal.  The exposure level was derived from three samples collected over 269 minutes, the remaining 211 minutes was calculated as zero (0) exposure time.  b.  An employee  engaged in abrasive blasting activities  on June 13, 2022, and was exposed to particles not otherwise regulated respriable fraction as an 8 hour time weighted average of 551.05 mg/m3, approximately 110 times the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 mg/m3; this limit was established to prevent adverse health effects.  The abrasive blaster used coal slag/glass mixture to abrasive blast media to blast various pieces of metal.  The exposure level was derived from three samples collected over 345 minutes, the remaining 135 minutes was calculated as zero (0) exposure time.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Abate by
Jun 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR  1910.1000(e):Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):  On or about June 13, 2022, employees abrasive blasting with coal slag/glass mixture inside the Abrasive Blast Building were exposed to particles not otherwise regulated respirable fraction exposure that exceeded the OSHA 8 hour time weighed average permissible exposure limit of 5.0 mg/m3.  Feasible engineering controls were not implemented to reduce employees exposure below particles not otherwise regulated respirable fraction permissible exposure limit of 5.0mg/m3    Abatement normally will be multistep as follows:  STEP 1:  Effective respiratory protection shall be provide and used by exposed employees as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering and/or administrative controls can be implemented, or whenever such controls fail to reduce employee exposure to within exposure limits.  Abatement due 30 days from issuance date:  STEP 2:  Submit to the Area Director a written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and /or administrative measures to control employee exposure to hazardous substance as referenced in this Citation.  This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this Citation:  1.  Evaluation of engineering/administrative control options;  2.  Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design;  3.  Procurement, installation, and operation of selected control measures; and  4.  Testing and acceptable or modification/redesign of controls.  All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by a competent industrial hygienist or other technically qualified person.  Abatement due 60 days from issuance date:  Step 3:  Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance.  Abatement due 90 days from issuance date:
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.94 A03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Abate by
Jun 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $7,252 · Current $5,439 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR 1910.94(a)(3)(i): Blast cleaning enclosures were not exhaust ventilated in such a way continuous inward flow of air will be maintained at all openings during the blasting operation:  On or about June 13, 2022, the Abrasive Blast Building did not have a continuous inward flow of air.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5439
  • — Z (S) $7252

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $6,471 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR  1910.95(c)(1):The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  On or about June 13, 2022, employees abrasive blasting were exposed to noise that exceeded 85 dBA, as an 8 hour time weighted average. a.  Employee was abrasive blasting and blowing off metal structure with compressed air was exposed to 105.28 dBA, as an 8 hour time weighed average.  Employee was sampled on June 13, 2022, and was sampled for 284 minutes, the remaining 196 minutes was calculated as 0 (zero) exposure time. b.  Employee was abrasive blasting and blowing off metal structure with compressed air was exposed to 101.13 dBA, as an 8  hour time weighted average.  Employee was sampled on June 13, 2022, and was sampled for 328 minutes, the remaining 152 minutes was calculated as 0 (zero) exposure time.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6471
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.95 I02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8110

29 CFR  1910.95(i)(2)(i):The employer did not ensure that hearing protectors are worn by an employee who is required by 29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1) to wear personal protective equipment: On or about June 13, 2022, employees abrasive blasting were exposed to noise that exceeded 90 dBA, as an 8 hour time weighted average, and wasn't wearing hearing protection to reduce the employees noise exposure to the ear below 90 dBA.  Employee was abrasive blasting and blowing off metal structure with compressed air was exposed to 101.13 dBA, as an 8  hour time weighted average.  Employee was sampled on June 13, 2022, and was sampled for 328 minutes, the remaining 152 minutes was calculated as 0 (zero) exposure time.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2023
Penalty
Initial $7,252 · Current $5,439 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about June 13, 2022, employees' abrasive blasting  particles not otherwise regulated respriable fraction exceeded 5.0 mg/3, as an 8-hour time weighted average and a written respiratory protection program was not implemented for abrasive blasters wearing respiratory protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5439
  • — Z (S) $7252

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about June 13, 2022, employees wearing supplied air respirator and elastomeric half mask respiratory protection  did not have a medical evaluation prior to performing abrasive blasting activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  On or about June 13, 2022, employees wore a elastomeric half mask respiratory protection to blowing off dust  from abrasive blasting activities and did not have a medical evaluation prior.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Penalty
Initial $7,252 · Current $4,623 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(iii):The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  On or about June 13, 2022, employees' abrasive blasting  particles not otherwise regulated respriable fraction exposure was not evaluated.  On or about June 13, 2022, employees' abrasive blasting  particles not otherwise regulated respriable fraction exceeded 5.0 mg/3, as an 8-hour time weighted average.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4623
  • — Z (S) $7252

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $2,175 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.242(b):Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:  On June 13, 2022, employees' abrasive blasting used compressed air without dead end pressure relief.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2175
  • — Z (S) $4351

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2023
Penalty
Initial $7,252 · Current $5,439 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):  On or about June 13, 2022, a written hazard communication program was not developed or implemented to convey the occupational hazards of abrasive blasting respirable dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5439
  • — Z (S) $7252

1910.1200 H02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(2):The employer did not provide employees with effective information on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area. Employees were not informed of the following the requirements of this section; any operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals are present; and, the location and availability of the written hazard communication program, including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals, and safety data sheets as required by this section.  On or about June 13, 2022, employees were not provided information on the occupational hazards associated with abrasive blasting media.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9130

29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(3):The employee training did not include the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(iv):  On or about June 13, 2022, employees were not trained on the occupational hazards of abrasive blasting respirable dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Springfield Welding and MFG. CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346016181.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.