PETERBOROUGH, NH —
OSHA Inspection: LG SERVICES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LG SERVICES, INC. in 111 HANCOCK RD., PETERBOROUGH, NH 03458 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 346022361.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LG SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- 111 HANCOCK RD.
- City
- PETERBOROUGH
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03458
- Mailing
- 149 EAST DUNSTABLE RD., NASHUA, NH 03062
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $465 · Current $465
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 1a, 1b, 3 and 4 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 1, 2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $465
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $465 · Current $465
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. 29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 2 Item No(s). 1, 2 and 3 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 1, 2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $465
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,144 · Current $4,144
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part. Jobsite - On or about May 13, 2022, a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where employees were exposed to falls, eye injuries, scaffold hazards and amputations on the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4144
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s). Jobsite - On or about June 15, 2022, the employer did not perform frequent and regular site inspections by a competent person where employees were exposed to falls, eye injuries, scaffold hazards and amputations on the jobsite
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,144 · Current $4,144
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee was using eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles. Jobsite - On or about June 15, 2022, an employee using a Ridgid compound miter saw was not protected from eye or face hazards from flying particles and debris where eye protection was not utilized.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4144
1926.451 B05 II
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,144 · Current $4,144
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform was able to support employees without tipping, or had guardrails which blocked employee access to the cantilevered end. Jobsite, side of building 2 - On or about June 15, 2022, the approximately 24 foot long pump jack scaffold platform located approximately six feet above ground extended approximately five feet past its left support and right support and was not restrained to prevent tipping or equipped with guardrails to block employee access to the cantilevered ends.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4144
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,144 · Current $4,144
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b):The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in. Jobsite - On or about June 15, 2022, the employer did not have each employee trained in erecting the pump jack scaffold where there was no triangular bracing installed on the bottoms of the support poles and there was no netting installed on the open ends and sides, or other means of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4144
1926.1053 B06
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,144 · Current $4,144
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level: Jobsite - On or about June 15, 2022, a 6 foot stepladder was in use by an employee that was set up unlevel with two of the ladders feet on a concrete step and two of the ladders feet on the concrete walkway, approximately 8 inches below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4144
1926.1053 B08
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(8): Ladders placed in a location where they could be displaced by workplace activities or traffic, such as in passageways, doorways, or driveways, were not secured to prevent accidental displacement, nor was a barricade used to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder. Jobsite - On or about June 15, 2022, an employee was using a 6 foot stepladder which was set up at an entrance door to the building and not secured or barricaded to prevent accidental displacement.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B20
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(20): Employees did not face the ladder when ascending or descending the ladder. Jobsite - On or about June 15, 2022, an employee using a 6 foot stepladder was ascending and descending the ladder while facing away from it.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.300 B01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $8,288 · Current $8,288
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use. a.) Jobsite - On or about June 15, 2022, a Ridgid compound miter saw was being used by an employee that did not have the lower blade guard installed, exposing the employee to the blade and possible cut and amputation injuries. b.) Jobsite - On or about June 15, 2022, a portable table saw onsite did not have the blade guard installed, exposing employees that use it to the blade and possible cut and amputation injuries. c.) Jobsite - On or about June 15, 2022, a Hitachi compound miter saw had its lower blade guard modified where it was tied in the up position with a piece of wire and could not automatically return and cover the blade as designed. LG Services, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1396884, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on August 16, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 149 Portsmouth Ave in Strafford, NH.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $8288
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $8,288 · Current $8,288
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section. Jobsite - On or about June 15, 2022, employees were not protected from a fall of approximately 20 feet from the ladder jack scaffold set up on the front of the building, where employees had accessed it to place siding material on the work shelf and did not utilize fall protection. LG Services, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1396884, citation number 1, item number 3b and was affirmed as a final order on August 16, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 149 Portsmouth Ave. in Strafford, NH
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $8288
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2022
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $8,288 · Current $8,288
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. Jobsite - On or about June 15, 2022, the support poles for the pump jack scaffolding system at both the front and side of the building were not secured at the bottom to prevent kick out or collapse of the system while in use. LG Services, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1396884, citation number 1, item number 4 and was affirmed as a final order on August 16, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 149 Portsmouth Ave. in Strafford, NH.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $8288
More inspections at LG Services, INC.
View LG Services, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346022361.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.