Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DIESSLIN STRUCTURES, INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DIESSLIN STRUCTURES, INC in 10955 CR 128, SALIDA, CO 81201 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 346031073.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Diesslin Structures, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Diesslin Structures, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10955 CR 128
City
SALIDA
State
CO
ZIP
81201
Mailing
7625 US HIGHWAY 50, SALIDA, CO 81201
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2022
Abate by
Aug 31, 2022
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(1)(i):Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary:   (a) Location: 10955 CR 128, Poncha Springs, CO 81201: On or about May 26, 2022, and at times prior, Diesslin Structures, Inc., as the controlling employer, did not ensure that employees of Geo Stucco LLC., performing stucco work on the scaffold were fully protected from fall hazards in that scaffold platforms were not fully planked between the metal uprights and the planks and contained gaps exceeding more than 1 inch wide.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6000
  • — Z (S) $10151

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2022
Abate by
Aug 31, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:  (a) Location: 10955 CR 128, Poncha Springs, CO 81201: On or about May 26, 2022, and at times prior, Diesslin Structures, Inc., as the controlling employer, did not ensure that employees of Geo Stucco LLC had safe means of access and egress onto the scaffold. This exposed subcontractor employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2022
Abate by
Aug 31, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(3):Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  (a) Location: 10955 CR 128, Poncha Springs, CO 81201: On or about May 26, 2022, and at times prior, Diesslin Structures, Inc., as the controlling employer, did not ensure that employees of Geo Stucco LLC., were protected from fall hazards in that the scaffold where subcontractor employees were conducting stucco operations was not inspected by the competent person for defects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 25, 2022
Abate by
Aug 31, 2022
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  (a) Location: 10955 CR 128, Poncha Springs, CO 81201: On or about May 26, 2022, and at times prior, Diesslin Structures, Inc., as the controlling employer did not ensure that employees of Geo Stucco LLC, were protected from fall hazards in excess of 6 feet while conducting stucco work on a commercial building where they were accessing a scaffold system from a roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6000
  • — Z (S) $10151

View Diesslin Structures, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346031073.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.