Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MADISON PROPERTY RESTORATION LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MADISON PROPERTY RESTORATION LLC in 4740 MCFARLAND COURT, MC FARLAND, WI 53558 (NAICS 238390). OSHA activity number 346035207.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Madison Property Restoration LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Madison Property Restoration LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4740 MCFARLAND COURT
City
MC FARLAND
State
WI
ZIP
53558
Mailing
4740 MCFARLAND COURT, MC FARLAND, WI 53558
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238390
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2022
Abate by
Dec 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $2,331 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about June 22, 2022, a respiratory protection program was not implemented for employees wearing a tight fitting respirator, i.e. elastomeric half mask and full-face respirators, when performing mold remediation activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2331
  • — Z (S) $3108

1910.134 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2022
Abate by
Dec 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(i):Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability:  On or about June 22,  2022, employees wore respirator with HEPA/Organic Vapor cartridges when spraying sodium hypochlorite based chemical.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2022
Abate by
Dec 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about June 22, 2022, a respirator medical evaluation was not provided to employee before wearing a tight fitting respirator, i.e. elastomeric half mask and full-face respirators, when performing mold remediation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2022
Abate by
Dec 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  On or about June 22, 2022,  employees were not fit tested prior to wearing tight fitting respirators, i.e. elastomeric half mask and full-face respirator, when performing mold remediation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2022
Abate by
Dec 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,865 · Current $1,399 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):  On or about June 22, 2022, a written hazard communication program was not developed to convey the health hazards of mold remediation chemicals to employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1399
  • — Z (S) $1865

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2022
Abate by
Dec 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(3)(ii):Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  On or about June 22, 2022, employee was not trained on the occupational health hazards of mold remediation chemicals, such as MMR, Onslaugh, IAQ Advanced Peroxide Cleaner No 8314.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346035207.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.