SOUTH DAYTON, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: EDBAUER CONSTRUCTION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of EDBAUER CONSTRUCTION in ROUTE 322 AND OAKS ROAD, SOUTH DAYTON, NY 14138 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 346054406.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EDBAUER CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- ROUTE 322 AND OAKS ROAD
- City
- SOUTH DAYTON
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 14138
- Mailing
- 2790 CLINTON STREET, WEST SENECA, NY 14224
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237310
- Employees
- 75
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.62 D02 V A
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $6,164 · Current $4,000 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(A): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with appropriate respiratory protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(f): a) Route 322 & Oaks Road, South Dayton, NY - On or about 6/2/2022 through 6/8/2022, employees performed torch burning operations of surfaces contaminated with lead based paint. The employer did not provide employees performing the torch burning operation as described in (d)(2)(iv) with appropriate respiratory protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(f) of the standard, which requires a respirator be provided having an Assigned Protection Factor (APF) of greater than 50 for exposures to lead in excess of 2,500ug/m3, per 29 CFR 1910.134 Table 1. Employees were provided half-mask air-purifying respirators having an APF of 10 while performing the torch burning operation. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4000
- · Z (S) $6164
1926.62 F03 I A
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(f)(3)(i)(A):The employer did not select, and provide to employees, the appropriate respirators as specified in 29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(i)(A): a) Route 322 & Oaks Road, South Dayton, NY - On or about 6/2/2022 through 6/8/2022, the employer did not select, and provide employees performing torch cutting operations of surfaces contaminated with lead based paint with the appropriate respirator as specified in 29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(i)(A). Employees were provided half-mask air-purifying respirators with an Assigned Protection Factor (APF) of 10 while performing the torch burning operation, prior to and during the performance of an exposure assessment, which required a respirator having an APF in excess of 50, per 29 CFR 1926.62(D)(2)(iv). ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.62 E01
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 13, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $6,164 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(e)(1): The employer did not implement all feasible engineering and work practice controls, including administrative controls, to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead to or below the permissible exposure limit: a) Route 322 & Oaks Road, South Dayton NY - On or about 6/2/2022 through 6/8/2022, the employer did not implement all feasible engineering and work practice controls, including administrative controls, to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead to or below the permissible exposure limit where employees were performing torch burning of materials coated with lead based paint. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $6164
1926.62 E02 II A
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $6,164 · Current $4,000 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(e)(2)(ii)(A): The written compliance program established by the employer did not include a description of each activity in which lead was emitted, for example, equipment used, material involved, controls in place, crew size, employee job responsibilities, operating procedures, and maintenance practices: a) Route 322 & Oaks Road, South Dayton NY - On or about 6/2/2022 through 6/8/2022, the employer's Lead Health & Safety Program did not address torch cutting of materials coated with lead based paint. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4000
- · Z (S) $6164
1926.62 L02
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $6,164 · Current $4,000 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(l)(2):The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained in the elements listed in paragraphs (i) through (viii) of this section: a) Route 322 & Oaks Road, South Dayton NY - On or about 6/2/2022 through 6/8/2022, employees were performing torch cutting and needling of surfaces contaminated with lead based paint. The employer did not include lead in the program established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200) and ensure that each employee had access to safety data sheets; was trained in accordance with the provisions of the Hazard Communication Standard and 29 CFR 1926.62(l); and ensure that all the following hazards were addressed: reproductive/developmental toxicity; central nervous system effects; kidney effects; blood effects; and acute toxicity effects. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4000
- · Z (S) $6164
1926.1153 C01
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $6,164 · Current $4,000 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section. a) Route 322 & Oaks Road, South Dayton NY - On or about and prior to 6/23/22 , employees used an excavator and jack hammers to break up and bust concrete. The demolition was conducted without the use of water or a dust suppressant to minimize dust emissions. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4000
- · Z (S) $6164
1926.1153 D02 I
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section: a) Route 322 & Oaks Road, South Dayton NY - On or about and prior to 6/23/22 , employees used an excavator and jack hammers to break up and bust concrete. The demolition was conducted without the use of water or a dust suppressant to minimize dust emissions. NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1153 F01
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $6,164 · Current $4,000 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(f)(1): The employer allowed dry sweeping or dry brushing where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica and wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other methods that minimize the likelihood of exposure were feasible. a) Route 322 & Oaks Road, South Dayton NY - On or about and prior to 6/23/22, the employer allowed dry sweeping where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to crystalline silica. Employees dry swept and then shoveled concrete debris potentially containing crystalline silica. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4000
- · Z (S) $6164
1926.1153 I01
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $6,164 · Current $0 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(1): The employer did not include respirable crystalline silica in the program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200): a) Route 322 and Oaks Road, South Dayton NY - On or about and prior to 6/23/22, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica while breaking up and busting concrete and cleaning up debris containing crystalline silica. The employer did not include respirable crystalline silica in their hazard communication program. NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $6164
1926.62 N01 II D
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(n)(1)(ii)(D):Exposure monitoring records did not include the name, and job classification of the employee monitored and of all other employees whose exposure the measurement was intended to represent: a) Route 322 and Oaks Road, South Dayton NY - On or about 6/23/22, exposure monitoring records, for lead monitoring conducted on 6/2/22, did not contain the job classifications of the employees monitored, or the names of other employees whose exposure the measurement was intended to represent.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237310)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 346054406.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.