Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SMITTY BUILT ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SMITTY BUILT ROOFING in 320 N. FRANKLIN, STANLEY, WI 54768 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346076391.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Smitty Built Roofing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Smitty Built Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
320 N. FRANKLIN
City
STANLEY
State
WI
ZIP
54768
Mailing
N5967 COUNTY ROAD BB, DURAND, WI 54736
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 7 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 3, 2023
Abate by
May 10, 2023
Penalty
Initial $376 · Current $376
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  (a) Citation 1, Item 1a; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) with an abatement date of December 27, 2022.  (b) Citation 1, Item 1b; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) with an abatement date of January 4, 2023.  (c) Citation 1, Item 2a; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) with an abatement date of December 27, 2022.  (d) Citation 1, Item 2b; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i) with an abatement date of December 27, 2022.  (e) Citation 1, Item 2d; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15) with an abatement date of December 27, 2022.  (f) Citation 1, Item 2e; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16) with an abatement date of December 27, 2022.  (g) Citation 1, Item 2f; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1060(a) with an abatement date of December 27, 2022.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 7 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 3, 2023
Abate by
May 10, 2023
Penalty
Initial $376 · Current $376
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):  The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  (a) Citation 1, Item 1a; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) with an abatement date of December 27, 2022.  (b) Citation 1, Item 1b; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) with an abatement date of January 4, 2023.  (c) Citation 1, Item 2a; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1) with an abatement date of December 27, 2022.  (d) Citation 1, Item 2b; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i) with an abatement date of December 27, 2022.  (e) Citation 1, Item 2d; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15) with an abatement date of December 27, 2022.  (f) Citation 1, Item 2e; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16) with an abatement date of December 27, 2022.  (g) Citation 1, Item 2f; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.1060(a) with an abatement date of December 27, 2022.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2022
Abate by
Dec 27, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $3,046 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   (a) Southeast side of main roof; Fall protection was not worn during residential reroofing activities, which included removal of existing roofing materials, roof sheathing installation, and reinstallation of underlayment materials and asphalt shingles at heights up to 32 feet on a 10/12 slope roof.  (b) East side of lower roof; Fall protection was not worn during residential reroofing activities of removing existing roofing materials at heights up to 10 feet, 9 inches on a 10/12 slope roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3045.7
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2022
Abate by
Jan 4, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  (a) Throughout the company; Fall hazard awareness and/or fall prevention training was not provided to employees before they performed roofing activities at heights up to 32 feet above the lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2022
Abate by
Dec 27, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $3,046 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  (a) Southeast side of the residence; Side rails of an extension ladder used to get on and off the main roof did not extend 3 feet past the upper landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3045.7
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2022
Abate by
Dec 27, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support).   (a) Southeast side of the residence; The angle of an extension ladder used to get on and off the main roof was greater than one-quarter of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:  (a) East side of residence; The top steps of a multi-position ladder setup as a self-supporting ladder (stepladder) were used to access an elevated work area as part of roofing operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2022
Abate by
Dec 27, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(15): Ladder(s) were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and/or after an occurrence that could have affected their safe use:  (a) Southeast side of the residence; A Keller brand extension ladder used to get on and off the main roof was not inspected for visible defects and had a bent rung (fourth rung from the bottom).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2022
Abate by
Dec 27, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired.   (a) Southeast side of the residence; A Keller brand extension ladder with a bent rung (fourth rung from the bottom) being used to get on and off the main roof was not removed from service and tagged out of service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2022
Abate by
Dec 27, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:   (a) Throughout the establishment; Training was not provided to inform employees how to properly setup, use, and inspect ladders before extension and multi-position ladders were used to access elevated work areas as part of roofing operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Smitty Built Roofing's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346076391.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.