Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BAKE FRESH COMPANY OF RHODE ISLAND, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BAKE FRESH COMPANY OF RHODE ISLAND, LLC in 79B TOM HARVEY ROAD, WESTERLY, RI 02891 (NAICS 311812). OSHA activity number 346083579.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bake Fresh Company of Rhode Island, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bake Fresh Company of Rhode Island, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
79B TOM HARVEY ROAD
City
WESTERLY
State
RI
ZIP
02891
Mailing
79B TOM HARVEY ROAD, WESTERLY, RI 02891
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311812
Employees
113
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2022
Abate by
Jan 17, 2023
Penalty
Initial $13,052 · Current $9,136 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  a) Production Floor: On or about 7/18/22 the employer did not establish a lockout/tagout program when employees are required to conduct maintenance on machinery such as, but not limited to, Belshaw Proofer model TM600.,Serial No. W0606117 and the Endflex POPLOK AHL-110, Serial No. 21650 . Energy sources include thermal, pneumatic, and electrical.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9136
  • — Z (S) $13052

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2022
Abate by
Dec 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $11,188 · Current $7,831 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:   a) Production Floor, Donut Cutting Station: On or about 7/18/22 the employer did not ensure that the rotating donut cutting die was guarded, which exposed employees to the rotating die. The opening was about 9" in height and 27.5" in length.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7831
  • — Z (S) $11188

1910.263 C03

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2022
Abate by
Dec 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $9,324 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.263(c)(3): Sprocket(s) and V-belt drive(s) of bakery machinery located within reach from platform(s) or passageway(s) or located within 8 feet 6 inches from the floor were not completely enclosed:  a) Production Floor (Proofer): On or about 7/18/22 the employer did not ensure that the Proofer conveyor sprocket was guarded. The steel plate that was guarding the  sprocket had been removed.  b) Production floor (M&M Cookie packaging): On or about 7/18/22 the employer did not ensure that the conveyor belt sprockets were adequately guarded on the Safeline metal detector. The guard was taped on and easily removable.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9324

1910.157 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2022
Abate by
Dec 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:  a) Production Floor: On or about 7/18/22 the employer did not ensure that the ABC portable fire extinguishers throughout the facility were inspected every month.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2022
Abate by
Jan 17, 2023
Penalty
Initial $1,047 · Current $733 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i):The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  a) Production Floor: On or about 7/18/22 the employer did not ensure that powered industrial truck operators completed training and evaluation prior to operating the vehicles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $733
  • — Z (O) $1047

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346083579.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.