LOVELAND, OH —
OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL PEREZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL PEREZ in 9493 DAVIS RD., LOVELAND, OH 45140 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346089162.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIGUEL PEREZ
- Site address
- 9493 DAVIS RD.
- City
- LOVELAND
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45140
- Mailing
- 306 SOUTH 6TH ST., HAMILTON, OH 45011
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):Accident prevention responsibilities. Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers. A.) On July 20, 2022, the employer did not conduct an adequate job site inspection in that employees were exposed to a fall hazard from a residential roof that was measured to be 14' to the ground and the Werner Aluminum extension ladder that was in use for access and egress was set up improperly in that the top of the ladder was set up lower that 3' above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. A.) On July 20, 2022, employees were not utilizing an adequate fall protection system while re-roofing a residential structure. The potential fall height was measured to be 14' with a roof pitch of 6/12.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. A.) On July 20, 2022, employees were exposed to a fall hazard measured to be 14' in that the Werner Aluminum extension ladder was not raised up at least 3 ft. above the upper landing surface, exposing employees to fall hazards in that there was no other type of grab handle to assist them in getting onto the top of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
More inspections at Miguel Perez
View Miguel Perez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346089162.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.