TINLEY PARK, IL —
OSHA Inspection: RONITO SERVICES
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RONITO SERVICES in 18121 CORK ROAD, TINLEY PARK, IL 60487 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346098619.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RONITO SERVICES
- Site address
- 18121 CORK ROAD
- City
- TINLEY PARK
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60487
- Mailing
- 659 N. LIBERTY ST., ELGIN, IL 60120
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a. On or about July 7, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, employees had been provided fall protection training, however, the employer failed to keep a written certification of record. Citation Number Item Number Abatement Date 0200112/07/2022
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a. On or about July 7, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee using a pneumatic nail gun did not wear safety glasses, thereby exposing the employee to the hazards associated with eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about July 7, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, nine (9) feet eight (8) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards. b. On or about July 7, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, ten (10 ) feet four (4) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17):The attachment point of the body belt was not located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head. a. On or about July 7, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, employees conducting residential roofing operations were not wearing personal fall arrest system (PFAS) with the attachment point at the employee's front waist, at a fall height of nine (9) foot eight (8) inches above the ground, thereby exposing the employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.1053 B22
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,486 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22):Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall: a. On or about July 7, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was carrying a bag with beverages up the ladder, thereby exposing the employee to hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2486
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Sep 21, 2022
- Abate by
- Dec 7, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a. On or about July 7, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, employees had been provided fall protection training, however, the employer failed to keep a written certification of record.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346098619.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.