MOOSUP, CT —
OSHA Inspection: MORGAN TRUCK BODY, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MORGAN TRUCK BODY, LLC in 85 MOOSUP POND ROAD, MOOSUP, CT 06354 (NAICS 336211). OSHA activity number 346107576.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MORGAN TRUCK BODY, LLC
- Site address
- 85 MOOSUP POND ROAD
- City
- MOOSUP
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06354
- Mailing
- 85 MOOSUP POND ROAD, DANIELSON, CT 06239
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336211
- Employees
- 110
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 D03
- Issued
- Oct 5, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $14,502 · Current $4,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(3): The employer did not ensure that when any correction or repair involves the structural integrity of the walking-working surface, a qualified person performs or supervises the correction or repair: Roof Pit: On, or about, July 21, 2022, an employee suffered serious injuries when the unsecured catwalk he was working from tipped and fell from the elevated work surface provided on either side of the roof pit. The catwalk had been disconnected from the supports of the mechanical lift that had broken. Although the instability of the unsecured catwalk was a general concern, a qualified person did not address the hazard created by the unsecured/unstable catwalk during the repair of the lifting mechanism.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4750
- — Z (S) $14502
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Oct 5, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $10,360 · Current $4,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Roof Pit Area: On, or about, July 21, 2022, in the following locations, employees were exposed to a fall hazard at the edge of the elevated work platform when lifting and lowering catwalk sections into and out of place to allow truck bodies to pass through the assembly stations: A. Front Pit. B. Middle Pit.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4750
- — Z (S) $10360
1910.29 B01
- Issued
- Oct 5, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $6,215 · Current $4,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.29(b)(1): The employer did not ensure that guardrail systems met the requirement that the top edge height of top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, that are 42 inches (107 cm), plus or minus 3 inches (8 cm), above the walking-working surface: Front Roof Pit: On, or about, July 21, 2022, chains used in lieu of guardrails to close off the openings in the elevated work surface when the moveable catwalk was not in position for use were measured to be less than 39 inches above the working surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4750
- — Z (S) $6215
1910.29 B02
- Issued
- Oct 5, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $4,750
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.29(b)(2): The employer did not ensure that guardrail systems met the requirement that midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, solid panels, or equivalent intermediate members that are installed between the walking-working surface and the top edge of the guardrail system as follows when there is not a wall or parapet that is at least 21 inches (53 cm) high: Front Roof Pit: On, or about, July 21, 2022, chains used in lieu of guardrails to close off the openings in the elevated work surface when the moveable catwalk was not in position for use were not provided with a midrail equivalent.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4750
- — Z (S) $0
1910.29 B02 I
- Issued
- Oct 5, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.29(b)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that guardrails met the requirement that midrails that are installed at a height midway between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking-working surface: Roof Pit: On, or about, July 21, 2022, the midrail provided on the moveable catwalk used at the front section was approximately 4.5 inches off center from the original design drawing and from the center of the space between the top of the toe board and the bottom of the top rail. Employees routinely squatted and bent over to perform job duties while standing on the catwalk.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Morgan Truck Body, LLC
View Morgan Truck Body, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336211)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346107576.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.