NEW HAVEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ROJELIO GAONA
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ROJELIO GAONA in 37 CENTER STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06510 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346116494.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch Rojelio Gaona — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rojelio Gaona is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROJELIO GAONA
- Site address
- 37 CENTER STREET
- City
- NEW HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06510
- Mailing
- 132 PEARL STREET, PORT CHESTER, NY 10573
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.252 A
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $3,046 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.252(a):An enclosed chute of wood, or equivalent material, was not used where materials were dropped more than 20 feet to points lying outside the exterior walls of the building(s). Worksite: The employer did not ensure that a chute was installed while materials such as bricks and concrete were thrown from the top edge of the building at a height of 36 feet above the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3045.7
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $3,046 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1):Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii). Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the metal frame scaffold that the employees were required to work from was fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3045.7
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7):Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the metal frame scaffold that employees were required to work from at heights up to 42 feet above the ground was erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 C02
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2):All brace connections were not secured. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the metal frame scaffold that the employees were required to work from was fully cross braced.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $3,046 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii):Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work from metal frame scaffold at heights above 10 feet were protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3045.7
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $3,046 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1):The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work from the metal frame scaffold at heights up to 42 feet above the ground were trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3045.7
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work from the roof of the building at a height above six feet were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 24, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,486 · Current $1,740 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4):Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that a four-foot stepladder was used for the purpose in which it was designed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1740.2
- — Z (S) $2486
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to use stepladders were trained by a competent person in the proper procedures to minimize the hazards associated with ladders.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
Jul 17, 2026
317744797 - JBC Roofing LLC · PORTLAND, OR
Jul 17, 2026
Cobra'S Roofing LLC · MERIDIAN, ID
Jul 17, 2026
Namicela Home Solutions INC · SYRACUSE, NY
Jul 16, 2026
Juan Cruz DBA Roofboys LLC · BRADLEY, IL
Jul 16, 2026
Resolute Roofing LLC · PONCE INLET, FL
More inspections in CT
Jul 16, 2026
Bianco & Sons, LLC · EAST HAVEN, CT
Jul 16, 2026
Moms Enfield · ENFIELD, CT
Jul 16, 2026
Harbor Freight · DAYVILLE, CT
Jul 14, 2026
Jananii, LLC · NEW BRITAIN, CT
Jul 14, 2026
Truss Manufacturing INC · NEWINGTON, CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346116494.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.