Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CULLION CONCRETE CORP.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CULLION CONCRETE CORP. in 875 PHENIX AVENUE, CRANSTON, RI 02921 (NAICS 339999). OSHA activity number 346136765.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cullion Concrete Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cullion Concrete Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
875 PHENIX AVENUE
City
CRANSTON
State
RI
ZIP
02921
Mailing
875 PHENIX AVENUE, CRANSTON, RI 02921
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339999
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $4,591 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  (a) Worksite: On or about 8/10/2022, the employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $4590.6
  • — I (S) $4590.6
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $6,091 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   (a) Worksite: On or about 8/10/2022, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $6090.6
  • — I (S) $6090.6
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form.   (a) Worksite: On or about 8/10/2022 the employer did not identify and evaluate for respiratory hazards in the workplace.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) Worksite: On or about 8/10/2022 the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to employees required to use tight fitting supplied air respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT).  (a) Worksite: On or about 8/10/2022 the employer did not ensure that employees, required to use tight-fittings respirators, passed an appropriate fit test.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary.  (a) Worksite: On or about 8/10/2022, the employer did not provide adequate training to employees in the use and care of tight fitting respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $6,091 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces.  (a) Worksite: On or about 8/10/2022, the employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces, such as vehicles and plant drum mixers.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $6090.6
  • — I (S) $6090.6
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146:  (a) Worksite: On or about 8/10/2022, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit-required confined space entry program.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $6,091 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  (a)Worksite:  On or about 8/10/2022, the employer did not establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training, and periodic inspections for the concrete plant drum and vehicle drum mixers.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $6090.6
  • — I (S) $6090.6
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2022
Abate by
Mar 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $4,591 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a) Worksite: On or about 8/10/2022, the employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program to include labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $4590.6
  • — I (S) $4590.6
  • — Z (S) $10151

View Cullion Concrete Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346136765.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.