Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JUAN ROBERTO MARTINEZ-ORTIZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JUAN ROBERTO MARTINEZ-ORTIZ in 4058 LEGENDS DRIVE, LOT # 320LC, CHAMPAIGN, IL 61822 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346142359.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Juan Roberto Martinez-Ortiz — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Juan Roberto Martinez-Ortiz is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4058 LEGENDS DRIVE, LOT # 320LC
City
CHAMPAIGN
State
IL
ZIP
61822
Mailing
1214 PINOAK LANE, RANTOUL, IL 61866
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2022
Abate by
Sep 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,419 · Current $2,564 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):  The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part:  On or about August 11, 2022, employees were exposed to eye and fall hazards, on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois, and the employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules and competent person oversight to govern employees' activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2564.25
  • — Z (S) $3419

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2022
Abate by
Sep 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,419 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2):  The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  On or about August 11, 2022, employees were exposed to eye and fall hazards, on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois, and the employer did not have a competent person conducting frequent and periodic safety inspections at the construction site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3419

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2022
Abate by
Sep 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,419 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  On or about August 11, 2022, an employee was exposed to eye hazards without eye protection, while using a pneumatic gun, on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3419

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2022
Abate by
Sep 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,786 · Current $3,590 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    On or about August 11, 2022, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 11 feet without fall protection, while roofing on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3589.5
  • — Z (S) $4786

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2022
Abate by
Sep 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,102 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(17):  The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head:  On or about August 11, 2022, an employee was exposed to fall hazards of 11 feet, and the employee's attachment point of the body harness was at the employee's side, not at the center of the employee's back, on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4102

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2022
Abate by
Sep 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,419 · Current $2,564 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):  Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:   On or about August 11, 2022, employees were exposed to fall hazards while accessing and exiting the roof via two extension ladders that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface of the roof, on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2564.25
  • — Z (S) $3419

View Juan Roberto Martinez-Ortiz's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346142359.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.