Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: T. GUZMAN CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of T. GUZMAN CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED in 127 CORPORATE DRIVE, DRUMS, PA 18222 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 346143233.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch T. Guzman Construction, Incorporated — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for T. Guzman Construction, Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
127 CORPORATE DRIVE
City
DRUMS
State
PA
ZIP
18222
Mailing
201 RYAN DRIVE, PITTSBURGH, PA 15220
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2023
Abate by
Feb 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $4,144

Hazardous substances 13409000D150L100P104

29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  a) 127 Corporate Drive, Drums, PA:  Employees were exposed to portland cement,  limestone, silica sand, gasoline and diesel fuel  and the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program, on or about August 12, 2022.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4144
  • — Z (S) $4144

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2023
Abate by
Feb 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances D150

29 CFR  1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    a) 127 Corporate Drive, Drums, PA:  Employees were exposed to diesel fuel and the employer did not ensure that each container of diesel fuel in the workplace was labeled, on or about August 12, 2022.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2023
Abate by
Feb 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $4,144

Hazardous substances 9000L100P104

29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)   a) 127 Corporate Drive, Drums, PA:  Employees were exposed to portland cement,  limestone, and silica and the employer did not ensure that employees knew the measures to take to protect themselves from chemical hazards including work practices and personal protective equipment, on or about August 12, 2022.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4144
  • — Z (S) $4144

1926.1153 I02 I C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2023
Abate by
Feb 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000L100P104

29 CFR  1926.1153(i)(2)(i)(C): The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of specific measures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to respirable crystalline silica, including engineering controls, work practices, and respirators to be used:   a) 127 Corporate Drive, Drums, PA:  Employees were exposed to portland cement,  limestone, and silica sand and the employer did not ensure that employees knew the measures to take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including work practices and personal protective equipment, on or about August 12, 2022.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2023
Abate by
Jan 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $4,144
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  a) 127 Corporate Drive, Drums, PA:  an employee using a Stihl handheld concrete saw to cut concrete blocks were exposed eye hazards and the employer did not ensure that each employee used appropriate eye protection, on or about August 12, 2022.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4144
  • — Z (S) $4144

1926.451 G01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $4,144
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1)(iv): Each employee on a self-contained adjustable scaffold was not protected by a guardrail system:   a) 127 Corporate Drive, Drums, PA: The guardrail system of the masons scaffold was removed to allow loading of concrete block,  and was not immediately replaced which exposed an employee to a fall hazard, on or about August 12, 2022.  ABATEMENT OBSERVED DURING INSPECTION - NO CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4144
  • — Z (S) $4144

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2023
Abate by
Jan 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $4,144

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  a) 127 Corporate Drive, Drums, PA:  The employer did not conduct an exposure assessment for silica when an employee working from the ground used a Stihl handheld concrete saw was cutting concrete blocks on or about August 12, 2022.  b) 127 Corporate Drive, Drums, PA:  The employer did not conduct an exposure assessment for silica when an employee working from a masons' scaffold used a Stihl handheld concrete saw was cutting concrete blocks on or about August 12, 2022.   ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4144
  • — Z (S) $4144

1926.1153 C01

Repeat Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2023
Abate by
Jan 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $8,288 · Current $8,288

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer shall fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section:  a) 127 Corporate Drive, Drums, PA: An employee working from the ground used a Stihl handheld concrete saw to cut concrete blocks and the employer did not ensure that the requirements of Table 1 were implemented, on or about August 12, 2022.  b) 127 Corporate Drive, Drums, PA: An employee working from a masons' scaffold used a Stihl handheld concrete saw to cut concrete blocks and the employer did not ensure that the requirements of Table 1 were implemented, on or about August 12, 2022.  T. Guzman Construction, Incorporated was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard, 1926.1153(c)(c)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1545614, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on October 4, 2021, with respect to a workplace located at 327 Water Street, Fairfield, Pennsylvania.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $8288
  • — Z (R) $8288

View T. Guzman Construction, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346143233.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.