CARLSTADT, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: REGALDO LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of REGALDO LLC in 642 5TH ST, CARLSTADT, NJ 07072 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346143498.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- REGALDO LLC
- Site address
- 642 5TH ST
- City
- CARLSTADT
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07072
- Mailing
- 143 COLFAX AVE, ROSELLE PARK, NJ 07204
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 6, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,486 · Current $1,740 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles. (a): Exterior Roof- The employer did not ensure that employees were using appropriate eye protection while using nail guns. Employees were using nail guns to install roofing and were exposed to projectile eye hazards, on or about, August 10, 2022. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1740.2
- — Z (S) $2486
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 6, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $3,046 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a): Exterior Roof- Two employees engaged in residential construction 6 feet or more above lower levels were not protected by any method of fall protection. The employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 27 feet while working on the roof, on or about August 10, 2022. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3045.7
- — Z (S) $4351
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346143498.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.