Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EMPIRE T.C. CONSTRUCTION LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EMPIRE T.C. CONSTRUCTION LLC in 174 MINUS AVE., GARDEN CITY, GA 31408 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346155484.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Empire T.C. Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Empire T.C. Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
174 MINUS AVE.
City
GARDEN CITY
State
GA
ZIP
31408
Mailing
239 WHITECROSS RD., SAVANNAH, GA 31419
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2022
Abate by
Nov 4, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,865 · Current $1,865
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  (a) Kingston Hotel jobsite, roof: On or about August 16, 2022, the employer exposed employees to struck-by and falling object hazards in that hard hats were not worn by employees that passed lumber to employees overhead.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1865

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2022
Abate by
Nov 4, 2022
Penalty
Initial $2,486 · Current $2,486
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  (a)  Kingston Hotel jobsite: On or about August 16, 2022, the employer exposed employees to flying object hazards in that eye protection was not used while employees framed a building using nail guns.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2486

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2022
Abate by
Nov 21, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  (a) Kingston Hotel jobsite: On or about August 16, 2022, the employer exposed employees to flying object and struck-by hazards in that employees were not instructed in hazards associated with construction.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2022
Abate by
Nov 4, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  (a)  Kingston Hotel jobsite, roof: On or about August 16, 2022, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards in that fall protection was not used by employees that framed a 3-story building.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2022
Penalty
Initial $2,486 · Current $2,486
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:  (a)  2nd floor ladder going to the 3rd floor of the building: On or about August 16, 2022, the employer exposed employees to a fall hazard in that employees used the top step of a stepladder to access a higher level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2486

1926.602 D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2022
Abate by
Dec 13, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l): Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under paragraph (d) of this section are identical to those set forth at paragraph (l) of 29 CFR 1910.178.    (a)  Kingston Hotel jobsite:  On or about August 16, 2022, the employer did not ensure safe operation of an industrial lift truck in use and did not meet the applicable requirements of operation, as defined in American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks, in that employees were exposed to potential struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346155484.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.