GARDEN CITY, GA —
OSHA Inspection: EMPIRE T.C. CONSTRUCTION LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EMPIRE T.C. CONSTRUCTION LLC in 174 MINUS AVE., GARDEN CITY, GA 31408 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346155484.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EMPIRE T.C. CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 174 MINUS AVE.
- City
- GARDEN CITY
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31408
- Mailing
- 239 WHITECROSS RD., SAVANNAH, GA 31419
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $1,865 · Current $1,865
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) Kingston Hotel jobsite, roof: On or about August 16, 2022, the employer exposed employees to struck-by and falling object hazards in that hard hats were not worn by employees that passed lumber to employees overhead.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1865
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,486 · Current $2,486
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: (a) Kingston Hotel jobsite: On or about August 16, 2022, the employer exposed employees to flying object hazards in that eye protection was not used while employees framed a building using nail guns.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2486
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: (a) Kingston Hotel jobsite: On or about August 16, 2022, the employer exposed employees to flying object and struck-by hazards in that employees were not instructed in hazards associated with construction.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. (a) Kingston Hotel jobsite, roof: On or about August 16, 2022, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards in that fall protection was not used by employees that framed a 3-story building.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,486 · Current $2,486
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: (a) 2nd floor ladder going to the 3rd floor of the building: On or about August 16, 2022, the employer exposed employees to a fall hazard in that employees used the top step of a stepladder to access a higher level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2486
1926.602 D
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2022
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l): Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under paragraph (d) of this section are identical to those set forth at paragraph (l) of 29 CFR 1910.178. (a) Kingston Hotel jobsite: On or about August 16, 2022, the employer did not ensure safe operation of an industrial lift truck in use and did not meet the applicable requirements of operation, as defined in American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks, in that employees were exposed to potential struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346155484.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.