OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL SEBASTIAN LUCAS

Issued

Sep 9, 2022

Abate by

Oct 5, 2022

Penalty

Initial $3,729 · Current $3,729

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  (a) On or about 09/02/2022 - 9271 Havenridge Loop, Tuscaloosa, AL, an employee was operating a coil roofing nailer to secure shingles on a residential roof and not wearing eye protection.

Issued

Sep 9, 2022

Abate by

Oct 5, 2022

Penalty

Initial $3,729 · Current $3,729

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system:   (a) On or about 09/02/2022 - 9271 Havenridge Loop, Tuscaloosa, AL, an employee placing shingles was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 11 feet.

Issued

Sep 9, 2022

Abate by

Oct 5, 2022

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  (a) On or about 09/02/2022 - 9271 Havenridge Loop, Tuscaloosa, AL, an employee exposed to fall hazards of approximately 11 feet while engaged in roofing activities had not been trained.

Issued

Sep 9, 2022

Penalty

Initial $3,170 · Current $3,170

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  (a) On or about 09/02/2022 - 9271 Havenridge Loop, Tuscaloosa, AL, an extension ladder used to access the roof did not extend 3 feet or more above the landing surface exposing employee(s) to fall hazards of approximately 11 feet.

Issued

Sep 9, 2022

Abate by

Oct 5, 2022

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:  (a) On or about 09/02/2022 - 9271 Havenridge Loop, Tuscaloosa, AL, an employee using a ladder to access the roof to perform roofing activities had not received training in the safe use of ladders.