ROME, GA —
OSHA Inspection: B & U CONSTRUCTION LLLP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of B & U CONSTRUCTION LLLP in HOMESITE 145 B ROYAL OAKS DR NE, ROME, GA 30149 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346195506.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- B & U CONSTRUCTION LLLP
- Site address
- HOMESITE 145 B ROYAL OAKS DR NE
- City
- ROME
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30149
- Mailing
- 2670 BARAMORE RD NE, MARIETTA, GA 30062
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.96
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,009 · Current $2,009
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.96:The employer did not ensure employees wore proper footwear which meets the requirements and specifications in American National Standard for Men's Safety-Toe Footwear, Z41.1-1967. (a) Homesite: On or about September 1, 2022, the employer exposed employees to crush hazards, in that the employer did not ensure that employees wore safety-toe footwear while carrying and installing subflooring on the residential site.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2009
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,009 · Current $2,009
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) Homesite: On or about September 1, 2022, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards, in that the employer did not ensure employees were provided with a hard hat while they were carrying subflooring over their head to install on the second story of the residence.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2009
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $2,679
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. (a) Homesite: On or about September 1, 2022, the employer exposed employees installing roof trusses to struck-by hazards in that they were operating pneumatic nail guns at 100 psi, without protective eyewear.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,018 · Current $4,018
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Homesite: Front and rear of second story; On or about September 1, 2022, employees were exposed to fall hazards, in that employees were performing framing activities at a height of approximately 10 feet 5 inches to the ground below without being provided fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4018
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. (a) Homesite: On or about September 1, 2022 and at times prior, employees were exposed to fall hazards, in that employees were performing framing activities at a height of approximately 10 feet 5 inches to the ground below and the employer did not prepare a written certification that employees had been trained in fall hazards and the measures needed to mitigate them.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346195506.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.