Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BARBERTON STEEL INDUSTRIES INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BARBERTON STEEL INDUSTRIES INC. in 240 E. HUSTON STREET, BARBERTON, OH 44203 (NAICS 331513). OSHA activity number 346196371.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Barberton Steel Industries INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Barberton Steel Industries INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
240 E. HUSTON STREET
City
BARBERTON
State
OH
ZIP
44203
Mailing
240 E. HUSTON STREET, BARBERTON, OH 44203
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331513
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 7 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2023
Abate by
Sep 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $501 · Current $501
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:    a.  The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 1 for hazards associated with not ensuring that guardrail systems are capable of withstanding, without failure, a force of at least 200 pounds (890 N) applied in a downward or outward direction within 2 inches (5 cm) of the top edge, at any point along the top rail.  b.  The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 2a for hazards associated with the employer not assessing the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).  c. The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 3 for hazards associated with not having an educational program that would familiarize all employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting.  d. The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 4 for hazards associated with not ensuring that each powered industrial truck operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.  e. The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 5a-5b for hazards associated with not inspecting cranes for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections. And for not completing inspections of the crane at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section.  f. The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 6a-6b for hazards associated with not providing effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.  g. The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 2 Item 1 for hazards associated with not establishing and implementing a written exposure control plan for crystalline silica.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $501

1910.29 B03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2023
Abate by
Jun 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.29(b)(3):29 CFR 1910.29(b)(3): The employer did not ensure that guardrail systems are capable of withstanding, without failure, a force of at least 200 pounds (890 N) applied in a downward or outward direction within 2 inches (5 cm) of the top edge, at any point along the top rail:  On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that the guardrails around the pits in the melt-shop could adequately withstand 200lbs of downward force.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2023
Abate by
Jun 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,465 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(1):The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to adequately asses the workplace for hazards present which would resuscitate the use of PPE.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $4465

1910.133 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2023
Abate by
Apr 17, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.133(a)(1):Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:  On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to ensure protective eye equipment was required to be worn in the grinding department.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2023
Abate by
Jun 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,465 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.157(g)(1):An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:  On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that employees received adequate fire extinguisher training. Employee are expected to use fire extinguishers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $4465

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2023
Abate by
Jun 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,465 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(2)(ii):The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace:  On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that Powered Industrial Truck operations training included formal instruction.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $4465

1910.179 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2023
Abate by
Jun 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.179(j)(2):The following items were not be inspected for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections:  On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that frequent (monthly) documented crane inspections were adequately conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2023
Abate by
Jun 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.179(j)(3):Complete inspections of the crane was not being performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section:  On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that periodic (annual) crane inspections were adequately conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2023
Abate by
Jun 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,465 · Current $1,750 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about January 20, 2023, the employer failed to provide hazard communication training to new employees. Employees routinely work with molten metals, silica sand, and chromium III sand.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $4465

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2023
Abate by
Jun 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):Employees had not been provided with GHS 2012 training including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system to be used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to provide employees with GHS 2012 training as required by the standard. The employer had not updated their hazard communication program to include the GHS 2012 requirements.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 F02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2023
Abate by
Jun 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1053(f)(2)(i):The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:  On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to establish and implement a written exposure control plan for the employee exposure of silica dust. Employees routinely use silica sand in the mold process and are exposed to silica dust in the shakeout department.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Barberton Steel Industries INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346196371.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.