BARBERTON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: BARBERTON STEEL INDUSTRIES INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BARBERTON STEEL INDUSTRIES INC. in 240 E. HUSTON STREET, BARBERTON, OH 44203 (NAICS 331513). OSHA activity number 346196371.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BARBERTON STEEL INDUSTRIES INC.
- Site address
- 240 E. HUSTON STREET
- City
- BARBERTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44203
- Mailing
- 240 E. HUSTON STREET, BARBERTON, OH 44203
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331513
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2023
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $501 · Current $501
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: a. The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 1 for hazards associated with not ensuring that guardrail systems are capable of withstanding, without failure, a force of at least 200 pounds (890 N) applied in a downward or outward direction within 2 inches (5 cm) of the top edge, at any point along the top rail. b. The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 2a for hazards associated with the employer not assessing the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). c. The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 3 for hazards associated with not having an educational program that would familiarize all employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting. d. The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 4 for hazards associated with not ensuring that each powered industrial truck operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. e. The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 5a-5b for hazards associated with not inspecting cranes for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections. And for not completing inspections of the crane at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section. f. The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Item 6a-6b for hazards associated with not providing effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area. g. The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 2 Item 1 for hazards associated with not establishing and implementing a written exposure control plan for crystalline silica.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $501
1910.29 B03
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.29(b)(3):29 CFR 1910.29(b)(3): The employer did not ensure that guardrail systems are capable of withstanding, without failure, a force of at least 200 pounds (890 N) applied in a downward or outward direction within 2 inches (5 cm) of the top edge, at any point along the top rail: On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that the guardrails around the pits in the melt-shop could adequately withstand 200lbs of downward force.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $6250
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,465 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to adequately asses the workplace for hazards present which would resuscitate the use of PPE.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $4465
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1):Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to ensure protective eye equipment was required to be worn in the grinding department.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,465 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1):An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting: On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that employees received adequate fire extinguisher training. Employee are expected to use fire extinguishers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $4465
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,465 · Current $1,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii):The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace: On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that Powered Industrial Truck operations training included formal instruction.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $4465
1910.179 J02
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2):The following items were not be inspected for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections: On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that frequent (monthly) documented crane inspections were adequately conducted.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $6250
1910.179 J03
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3):Complete inspections of the crane was not being performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section: On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that periodic (annual) crane inspections were adequately conducted.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,465 · Current $1,750 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about January 20, 2023, the employer failed to provide hazard communication training to new employees. Employees routinely work with molten metals, silica sand, and chromium III sand.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1750
- — Z (S) $4465
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):Employees had not been provided with GHS 2012 training including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system to be used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to provide employees with GHS 2012 training as required by the standard. The employer had not updated their hazard communication program to include the GHS 2012 requirements.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1053 F02 I
- Issued
- Mar 1, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i):The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan: On or about September 7, 2022, the employer failed to establish and implement a written exposure control plan for the employee exposure of silica dust. Employees routinely use silica sand in the mold process and are exposed to silica dust in the shakeout department.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Barberton Steel Industries INC.
View Barberton Steel Industries INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331513)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346196371.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.