Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO VELASQUEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANTONIO VELASQUEZ in 1700 HINTERWALD STREET, LEANDER, TX 78641 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 346204928.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Antonio Velasquez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Antonio Velasquez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ANTONIO VELASQUEZ
Site address
1700 HINTERWALD STREET
City
LEANDER
State
TX
ZIP
78641
Mailing
12151 NORTH INTERSTATE 35 #1516, AUSTIN, TX 78753
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2022
Abate by
Sep 26, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,865 · Current $746 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  On or about September 7, 2022, and at times prior there to, an employee had been using a pneumatic staple gun to secure metal wire to a home without wearing appropriate eye protection, exposing the employees to the hazard of being struck in the eye(s) by flying debris or projectiles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $746
  • — Z (S) $1865

1926.451 E04 XII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2022
Abate by
Sep 26, 2022
Penalty
Initial $2,486 · Current $994 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(4)(xii): Guardrails meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section were not provided on the open sides and ends of each landing.  On or about September 7, 2022, employees were working from a scaffold without guardrails provided at the open sides and ends, exposing employees to hazards such as falling approximately 15 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $994.4
  • — Z (S) $2486

1926.451 G04 XV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2022
Abate by
Sep 26, 2022
Penalty
Initial $2,486 · Current $994 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv): Crossbracing used in place of a midrail was unacceptable because the crossing point of two braces was not between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches ((0.8 M) above the work platform or as a toprail crossing point of two braces were not between 38 inches (0.97 m) and 48 inches (1.3 m) above the work platform.  The endpoints at each upright were more than 48 inches (1.3 m) apart.  On or about September 7, 2022, and at times prior thereto, employees were installing wire to a residential home under new construction from a scaffold where midrailing was not used. Crossbracing was between 38 inches and 48 inches, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $994.4
  • — Z (S) $2486

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2022
Abate by
Sep 26, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,865 · Current $746 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work on a scaffold be trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used, and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  On or about September 7, 2022, and at times prior thereto, employees were working on a scaffold installing wire to a residential home under construction without the employer providing training to employees in recognition of hazards associated with this type of scaffold, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $746
  • — Z (S) $1865

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346204928.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.