FRISCO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: CANIZALEZ FRAMING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CANIZALEZ FRAMING in 10888 COASTAL VIOLET, FRISCO, TX 75035 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346207384.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CANIZALEZ FRAMING
- Site address
- 10888 COASTAL VIOLET
- City
- FRISCO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75035
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 118930, CARROLLTON, TX 75007
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 20, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) On or about September 7, 2022, where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while working in areas where overhead hazards existed without the use of head protection.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $4351
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 20, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer did not develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502: a) On or about September 7, 2022, at the residential construction site, employees were exposed fall hazards of more than 6-feet above the ground level below while applying decorative forms to the exterior of the building.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $4351
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Sep 20, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): A stairway or ladder was not provided at all personnel points of access where there is a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist is provided: a) On or about September 7, 2022, at the single family residential construction site, where employees were exposed to fall hazards while using the stud framed walls as access/egress to the upper landings.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $4351
- — Z (S) $4351
More inspections at Canizalez Framing
View Canizalez Framing's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346207384.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.